Re: Latest changes to regexengine have made vim really slow

2013-06-03 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Axel Bender wrote: I could probably live with the slowing down if it only affected re=2. But it also affects re=1 which is not acceptable. The effect is quite noticeable, 13 to 20 secs that's a lot. I hope that Bram goes into that... There are no changes to the old regexp engine that would

Re: Latest changes to regexengine have made vim really slow

2013-06-03 Fir de Conversatie Charles
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote: Axel Bender wrote: I could probably live with the slowing down if it only affected re=2. But it also affects re=1 which is not acceptable. The effect is quite noticeable, 13 to 20 secs that's a lot. I hope that Bram

Re: Latest changes to regexengine have made vim really slow

2013-06-03 Fir de Conversatie Axel Bender
Sorry Bram, I wasn't aware of this (... Note that you need to set 'regexpengine' before opening a file ...) - maybe this should go into the docs? Anyway, making the above mentioned setting in .vimrc brings back the 'good old times' ;-) Just for curiosity: 1) What ist NFA good for if it is so

Re: Latest changes to regexengine have made vim really slow

2013-06-03 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Charles Peacech wrote: On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote: Axel Bender wrote: I could probably live with the slowing down if it only affected re=2. But it also affects re=1 which is not acceptable. The effect is quite noticeable, 13 to 20 secs

Re: Latest changes to regexengine have made vim really slow

2013-06-03 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Axel Bender wrote: Sorry Bram, I wasn't aware of this (... Note that you need to set 'regexpengine' before opening a file ...) - maybe this should go into the docs? Anyway, making the above mentioned setting in .vimrc brings back the 'good old times' ;-) Just for curiosity: 1) What

Re: Latest changes to regexengine have made vim really slow

2013-06-03 Fir de Conversatie Axel Bender
Thanks for the clarification, Bram. Chances that the NFA engine will take up speed? -- -- You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received

Latest changes to regexengine have made vim really slow

2013-06-02 Fir de Conversatie Axel Bender
Comparing versions 7.3.1078 and 7.3.1090 (both compiled by myself) show a very slow behavior of the latest(?) version e.g. when paging through a file, independent of the regexpengine chosen. See attached sample. -- -- You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. Do not top-post! Type

Re: Latest changes to regexengine have made vim really slow

2013-06-02 Fir de Conversatie David Fishburn
On Jun 2, 2013, at 6:06 AM, Axel Bender axel.ben...@cip-kommunal.de wrote: Comparing versions 7.3.1078 and 7.3.1090 (both compiled by myself) show a very slow behavior of the latest(?) version e.g. when paging through a file, independent of the regexpengine chosen. I also noticed this

Re: Latest changes to regexengine have made vim really slow

2013-06-02 Fir de Conversatie John Little
On Jun 2, 2013, at 6:06 AM, Axel Bender axel.ben...@cip-kommunal.de wrote: Comparing versions 7.3.1078 and 7.3.1090 (both compiled by myself) show a very slow behavior of the latest(?) version e.g. when paging through a file, independent of the regexpengine chosen. I checked this out, and

Re: Latest changes to regexengine have made vim really slow

2013-06-02 Fir de Conversatie Axel Bender
I could probably live with the slowing down if it only affected re=2. But it also affects re=1 which is not acceptable. The effect is quite noticeable, 13 to 20 secs that's a lot. I hope that Bram goes into that... -- -- You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. Do not top-post!