On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
...
I would add not only .*.swp but even .*.sw? (to ignore .swo .swn etc.),
src/auto/config.mk (which is regenerated by configure from the
config.mk.dist and a couple of others) and runtime/doc/tags (which is
regenerated by make
Tony Mechelynck, 2010-05-28 02:59:
On 28/05/10 01:54, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
You can still add something like .*.swp to .hgignore for the swap files.
I would add not only .*.swp but even .*.sw? (to ignore .swo .swn etc.),
Yes, that would make sense.
src/auto/config.mk (which is
On May 25, 3:37 pm, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
This is moot though, a file edited by several people is very unusual,
and if it does happen an undo file won't be very useful. Better not
enable the undofile option for this kind of file.
I haven't had time to try out the Vim 7.3
On May 26, 7:32 am, Tony Mechelynck antoine.mechely...@gmail.com
wrote:
As for floating point numbers, I constantly use Vim as a floating-point
calculator; I wouldn't say it's a useless feature. Not a /necessary/ one
-- I could do without the trig and exp/log functions
When floating point
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Ben Fritz wrote:
Is persistent undo a buffer-local option? It sounds like perhaps it
should be, so that users can easily turn it on and off on a per-file
basis.
I agree that this is an option that should be possible to set locally.
Setting it with :set should default to
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Ben Fritz fritzophre...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 25, 3:37 pm, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
This is moot though, a file edited by several people is very unusual,
and if it does happen an undo file won't be very useful. Better not
enable the undofile
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 17:23, Ben Fritz fritzophre...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 26, 7:32 am, Tony Mechelynck antoine.mechely...@gmail.com
wrote:
As for floating point numbers, I constantly use Vim as a floating-point
calculator; I wouldn't say it's a useless feature. Not a /necessary/ one
--
Bram Moolenaar, 2010-05-26 22:59:
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 25/05/10 22:37, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
The undo files are hidden, all version control systems I know will
ignore them. E.g. swap files are normally not a problem.
[...]
For a counterexample, Mercurial tracks
On 28/05/10 01:54, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
Bram Moolenaar, 2010-05-26 22:59:
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 25/05/10 22:37, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
The undo files are hidden, all version control systems I know will
ignore them. E.g. swap files are normally not a problem.
[...]
For a
On 25/05/10 22:37, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
The undo files are hidden, all version control systems I know will
ignore them. E.g. swap files are normally not a problem.
[...]
For a counterexample, Mercurial tracks files regardless of an initial
dot: .hgignore is specifically mentioned as
On 25/05/10 19:42, Christian Brabandt wrote:
Hi Nikolai!
On Di, 25 Mai 2010, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
2010/5/25 Dominique Pellédominique.pe...@gmail.com:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
That said, I think persistent undo is more or less useless and, well,
just a big pile of potential problems.
On 25/05/10 22:13, François Ingelrest wrote:
2010/5/25 Dominique Pellédominique.pe...@gmail.com:
Does anybody use all Vim features? :-)
Does anybody actually know all Vim features? :-)
Sometimes I accidentally quit Vim while editing a file (hitting w and
q at the same time when saving for
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 25/05/10 22:37, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
The undo files are hidden, all version control systems I know will
ignore them. E.g. swap files are normally not a problem.
[...]
For a counterexample, Mercurial tracks files regardless of an initial
dot:
When editing a file over a network or a removable media (USB stick) it's
very easy to misplace the undo file. Also, when a file is edited by
several people, or the same person with different login names or from
different systems, the undo file would go in the wrong place. Also
problems with
On 24/05/10 23:52, Jordan Lewis wrote:
[...]
I should have worded my post better - I did mean the directory of the
file as you indicate. And the patch doesn't blindly name all undo files
the same if they have the same filename - with a common undo directory,
the files will be named
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:21:43PM +0200, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 24/05/10 23:52, Jordan Lewis wrote:
[...]
I should have worded my post better - I did mean the directory of the
file as you indicate. And the patch doesn't blindly name all undo files
the same if they have the same filename -
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 02:29:23PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
James Vega wrote:
Are the undo files supposed to be hidden when 'undodir' is not the
current directory? If so, that's not currently the case.
When putting undo files with the edited files they are made hidden, just
like swap
On 25/05/10 14:19, James Vega wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:21:43PM +0200, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 24/05/10 23:52, Jordan Lewis wrote:
[...]
I should have worded my post better - I did mean the directory of the
file as you indicate. And the patch doesn't blindly name all undo files
the
Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 10:06 pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
I also changed it to put the undofile with the edited file. That should
work, as writing a file usually means the undofile can be written there
as well. It's possible to change this with the 'undodir' option.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:48, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 10:06 pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
I also changed it to put the undofile with the edited file. That should
work, as writing a file usually means the undofile can be written there
as well. It's
That said, I think persistent undo is more or less useless and, well,
just a big pile of potential problems. Persistent undo is in the
version control system, not in the editor.
I agree with that. This would probably be best left to versionning systems.
Shouldn't Vim be used for purely text
Michael Wookey wrote:
On 25 May 2010 06:06, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
As you may have noticed, I have added the persistent undo patch
yesterday.
There is a minor typo in the doc for 'persistent-undo'. Patch attached.
Thanks!
--
Bare feet magnetize sharp metal objects
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 13:11:34 Milan Vancura wrote:
When editing a file over a network or a removable media (USB stick) it's
very easy to misplace the undo file. Also, when a file is edited by
several people, or the same person with different login names or from
different systems, the
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
That said, I think persistent undo is more or less useless and, well,
just a big pile of potential problems. Persistent undo is in the
version control system, not in the editor.
I think this is a bit harsh. Not every file is in version control.
And even if you do use
2010/5/25 Dominique Pellé dominique.pe...@gmail.com:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
That said, I think persistent undo is more or less useless and, well,
just a big pile of potential problems. Persistent undo is in the
version control system, not in the editor.
I think this is a bit harsh.
And I
Hi Nikolai!
On Di, 25 Mai 2010, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
2010/5/25 Dominique Pellé dominique.pe...@gmail.com:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
That said, I think persistent undo is more or less useless and, well,
just a big pile of potential problems. Persistent undo is in the
version control
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 19:42, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org wrote:
On Di, 25 Mai 2010, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
2010/5/25 Dominique Pellé dominique.pe...@gmail.com:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
That said, I think persistent undo is more or less useless and, well,
just a big pile of
On Tue, 25 May 2010, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
And no one forced you to defend this feature.
True, nobody is forcing anybody to defend the feature, but what do you
expect to happen when you complain about it?
Why does everyone have to come in and say basically the same thing
in response to
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 21:04, Christian J. Robinson hept...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 25 May 2010, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
And no one forced you to defend this feature.
True, nobody is forcing anybody to defend the feature, but what do you
expect to happen when you complain about it?
I
2010/5/25 Dominique Pellé dominique.pe...@gmail.com:
Does anybody use all Vim features? :-)
Does anybody actually know all Vim features? :-)
Sometimes I accidentally quit Vim while editing a file (hitting w and
q at the same time when saving for instance), losing the undo history
at the same
Milan Vancura wrote:
When editing a file over a network or a removable media (USB stick) it's
very easy to misplace the undo file. Also, when a file is edited by
several people, or the same person with different login names or from
different systems, the undo file would go in the wrong
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Nikolai Weibull n...@bitwi.se wrote:
I figured that “That said, I think persistent undo is more or less
useless and, well, just a big pile of potential problems. Persistent
undo is in the version control system, not in the editor.” is me
stating an opinion
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 22:38, Jordan Lewis jordanthele...@gmail.com wrote:
For example, pretend you're developing the ultimate novel Vim feature, but
you've caused a bug, and want to trace it in gdb. You edit Vim's makefile to
enable -g in CFLAGS, recompile, track down the bug, and want to
Hi Bram!
On Di, 25 Mai 2010, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Christian Brabandt wrote:
This completely depends on what you are doing. When a file has been
edited by someone else, using Vim, you can undo his changes. That can
be very useful. On the other hand, the undo file will reveal anything
On May 24, 1:06 pm, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
I have also changed the MS-Windows installer. It should now work in
Windows 7. I also tried making the Edit with Vim context menu work
for 64 bit systems, but it doesn't appear to work yet.
You can try the self-installing
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
As you may have noticed, I have added the persistent undo patch
yesterday. The core of this was done by Jordan Lewis.
This means you can make changes to a file, quit Vim, edit that same file
and undo the previous
Nico Raffo wrote:
On May 24, 1:06=A0pm, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
I have also changed the MS-Windows installer. =A0It should now work in
Windows 7. =A0I also tried making the Edit with Vim context menu work
for 64 bit systems, but it doesn't appear to work yet.
You can
Jordan Lewis wrote:
--0016e68ee46947c7a104875ce992
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
As you may have noticed, I have added the persistent undo patch
yesterday. The core of this was done by Jordan
Bram Moolenaar schrob am 24.05.2010 22:56:
I suppose most people will want Python 2.6. I'll see if I manage to
make that work. You can try it yourself, if you like.
It compiles without any problem in my builds. :-)
--
You received this message from
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:56:59PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Jordan Lewis wrote:
I suppose the argument could be made that the user who has added undo
persistence to her vimrc would have read enough of the documentation to know
that she must also set undodir if she doesn't want a
On 24/05/10 22:30, Jordan Lewis wrote:
[...]
I am a bit concerned with your decision to write undo files to the
current directory by default, though. I think that it is impolite to
users to have Vim store its state (especially at the
1-statefile-per-file rate that undo persistence uses) directly
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Tony Mechelynck
antoine.mechely...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/05/10 22:30, Jordan Lewis wrote:
[...]
I am a bit concerned with your decision to write undo files to the
current directory by default, though. I think that it is impolite to
users to have Vim store
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, James Vega james...@jamessan.com wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:56:59PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Jordan Lewis wrote:
I suppose the argument could be made that the user who has added undo
persistence to her vimrc would have read enough of the
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:56:59PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[..]
I suppose most people will want Python 2.6. I'll see if I manage to
make that work. You can try it yourself, if you like.
I also have a patch to support Python 3. We'll have to see if
dynamically loading both will work. I
On 25 May 2010 06:06, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
As you may have noticed, I have added the persistent undo patch
yesterday.
There is a minor typo in the doc for 'persistent-undo'. Patch attached.
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your
45 matches
Mail list logo
