Dominique Pelle wrote:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
With the few files I received I already found two bugs in the new regexp
engine.
But I received only 7 files. I need many more! So now asking everyone,
not just syntax file maintainers, to send me files for testing. Please
read the
Hello Bram,
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
The plan is to include a new regexp engine in Vim 7.4. For testing
I would like to get a lot of files for which we have syntax
highlighting. I can then compare the highlighting of these files with
the old and the new engine to find anything that is not
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 6:00:11 PM UTC+2, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
The plan is to include a new regexp engine in Vim 7.4. For testing
I would like to get a lot of files for which we have syntax
highlighting. I can then compare the highlighting of these files with
the old and the new
Thomas Köhler wrote:
Hello Bram,
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
The plan is to include a new regexp engine in Vim 7.4. For testing
I would like to get a lot of files for which we have syntax
highlighting. I can then compare the highlighting of these files with
the old and the new engine to
Ping -
hi Bram:
attached is the asciidoc syntax file
(http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/#_editor_support) I've been using.
thanks!
It wasn't actually attached:
Thisbodypartwillbedownloadedondemand
- Bram
--
It is illegal to rob a bank and then shoot at the bank teller with a water
I wrote:
The plan is to include a new regexp engine in Vim 7.4. For testing
I would like to get a lot of files for which we have syntax
highlighting. I can then compare the highlighting of these files with
the old and the new engine to find anything that is not compatible.
Please send
Christian Brabandt wrote:
Hi Bram!
On Mo, 13 Mai 2013, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Not. I only want to work with the syntax files that I have, which are
the distributed ones. I'm not going to download and install syntax
files for this test.
There are more than 500 syntax files, that should be
Hello
-- snip --
I notice it doesn't get recognized, becaues the pattern for the filetype
is */etc/dnsmasq.conf. I think it will be ok to just match
dnsmasq.conf.
No dnsmasq.conf will get you false positives.
# find /etc -iname 'dnsmasq.conf'
/etc/dbus-1/system.d/dnsmasq.conf
Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Sa, 11 Mai 2013, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
The plan is to include a new regexp engine in Vim 7.4. For testing
I would like to get a lot of files for which we have syntax
highlighting. I can then compare the highlighting of these files with
the old and the
Thilo Six wrote:
attached is a example file for ft=dnsmasq.
Thanks.
I notice it doesn't get recognized, becaues the pattern for the filetype
is */etc/dnsmasq.conf. I think it will be ok to just match
dnsmasq.conf.
--
`When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to
Hi Bram!
On Mo, 13 Mai 2013, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Not. I only want to work with the syntax files that I have, which are
the distributed ones. I'm not going to download and install syntax
files for this test.
There are more than 500 syntax files, that should be more than enough.
I
Resending to list, too.
Hello Bram,
Excerpt from Bram Moolenaar:
-- snip --
I notice it doesn't get recognized, becaues the pattern for the filetype
is */etc/dnsmasq.conf. I think it will be ok to just match
dnsmasq.conf.
No dnsmasq.conf will get you false positives.
# find /etc -iname
Hello
attached is a example file for ft=dnsmasq.
--
Regards,
Thilo
4096R/0xC70B1A8F
721B 1BA0 095C 1ABA 3FC6 7C18 89A4 A2A0 C70B 1A8F
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit
That is one of the ways. It might be a bit difficult to find out where
a difference comes from though. Directly using the method that TOHtml
uses to figure out the highlighting might work better.
You can use format.vim. It is faster and it is can output for
Vim
Hi Bram!
On Sa, 11 Mai 2013, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
The plan is to include a new regexp engine in Vim 7.4. For testing
I would like to get a lot of files for which we have syntax
highlighting. I can then compare the highlighting of these files with
the old and the new engine to find
The plan is to include a new regexp engine in Vim 7.4. For testing
I would like to get a lot of files for which we have syntax
highlighting. I can then compare the highlighting of these files with
the old and the new engine to find anything that is not compatible.
Please send me a file that
I maintain the freebasic.vim and ibasic.vim files. They are already a
part of the vim release. No changes have been made to them. Do I need
to resend them to you?
TIA!
Mark Manning
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text
Hi Bram.
A random thought floated in my mind,
that checking :TOHtml output between new/old regexp engines can
automate output checking?
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Mark Manning mar...@sim1.us wrote:
I maintain the freebasic.vim and ibasic.vim files. They are already a part
of the vim
Mark Manning wrote:
I maintain the freebasic.vim and ibasic.vim files. They are already a
part of the vim release. No changes have been made to them. Do I need
to resend them to you?
I don't want the syntax file plugin, as you mention I already have it.
I want a file that gets
Tyru wrote:
A random thought floated in my mind,
that checking :TOHtml output between new/old regexp engines can
automate output checking?
That is one of the ways. It might be a bit difficult to find out where
a difference comes from though. Directly using the method that TOHtml
uses to
20 matches
Mail list logo
