Re: slick way to keep patches?

2008-11-22 Fir de Conversatie Richard Hartmann
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 19:49, Markus Heidelberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if exists(rnu) Duh.. Thanks :) Richard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

Re: slick way to keep patches?

2008-11-21 Fir de Conversatie Richard Hartmann
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 16:22, Charles Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only criticism I could make of MH's patch, and perhaps I'm just ignorant of how to do it -- but I rather like the plugin's different colorization of previous vs future relative numbers, and would like it if the

Re: slick way to keep patches?

2008-11-21 Fir de Conversatie Charles Campbell
Richard Hartmann wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 16:22, Charles Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only criticism I could make of MH's patch, and perhaps I'm just ignorant of how to do it -- but I rather like the plugin's different colorization of previous vs future relative numbers,

Re: slick way to keep patches?

2008-11-17 Fir de Conversatie Charles Campbell
sc wrote: On Sunday 16 November 2008 2:34 pm, Markus Heidelberg wrote: sc, 15.11.2008: I finally bit the bullet and applied Markus Heidelberg's relative number patch to my source -- I love it so much I added Nice to hear. With subversion you don't have to reapply the

Re: slick way to keep patches?

2008-11-17 Fir de Conversatie sc
On Monday 17 November 2008 9:22 am, Charles Campbell wrote: [bigsnip] The only criticism I could make of MH's patch, and perhaps I'm just ignorant of how to do it -- but I rather like the plugin's different colorization of previous vs future relative numbers, and would like it if the

Re: slick way to keep patches?

2008-11-17 Fir de Conversatie Charles Campbell
sc wrote: On Monday 17 November 2008 9:22 am, Charles Campbell wrote: [bigsnip] The only criticism I could make of MH's patch, and perhaps I'm just ignorant of how to do it -- but I rather like the plugin's different colorization of previous vs future relative numbers, and would like

Re: slick way to keep patches?

2008-11-16 Fir de Conversatie Markus Heidelberg
sc, 15.11.2008: I finally bit the bullet and applied Markus Heidelberg's relative number patch to my source -- I love it so much I added Nice to hear. In the meantime I would like to know if there's a slick way to check svn updates and runtime rsyncs against the list of 22 files the

Re: slick way to keep patches?

2008-11-16 Fir de Conversatie sc
On Sunday 16 November 2008 2:34 pm, Markus Heidelberg wrote: sc, 15.11.2008: I finally bit the bullet and applied Markus Heidelberg's relative number patch to my source -- I love it so much I added Nice to hear. With subversion you don't have to reapply the patch. When working on

Re: slick way to keep patches?

2008-11-15 Fir de Conversatie Xavier de Gaye
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 1:21 AM, sc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I finally bit the bullet and applied Markus Heidelberg's relative number patch to my source -- I love it so much I added nmap silent S-F9 :call NumberToggle()CR imap silent S-F9 C-O:call NumberToggle()CR function! NumberToggle()

slick way to keep patches?

2008-11-14 Fir de Conversatie sc
I finally bit the bullet and applied Markus Heidelberg's relative number patch to my source -- I love it so much I added nmap silent S-F9 :call NumberToggle()CR imap silent S-F9 C-O:call NumberToggle()CR function! NumberToggle() if number set relativenumber else if

Re: slick way to keep patches?

2008-11-14 Fir de Conversatie Navdeep Parhar
In the meantime I would like to know if there's a slick way to check svn updates and runtime rsyncs against the list of 22 files the patch updates, and re-apply the pieces of the patch affected? I wrote a patch that adds :lscscope to vim. It's in the TODO but hasn't been accepted yet