Re: stl, stlnc of fillchars are not always applied, depends on difference between StatusLine and StatusLineNC

2016-12-12 Fir de Conversatie ouidacisneros via vim_dev
On Tue, 12/13/16, itchyny wrote: Subject: Re: stl, stlnc of fillchars are not always applied, depends on difference between StatusLine and StatusLineNC To: "vim_dev" Cc:

Re: stl, stlnc of fillchars are not always applied, depends on difference between StatusLine and StatusLineNC

2016-12-12 Fir de Conversatie itchyny
On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 1:26:30 AM UTC+9, Ozaki Kiichi wrote: > It is better to add it for an unit test. > > maka -C src test_fillchars Thank you for your notice, it's surely useful. Here is the latest patch. https://gist.github.com/itchyny/936f5c7e7f6396bf2f6afbe246206d47 Regards,

Re: stl, stlnc of fillchars are not always applied, depends on difference between StatusLine and StatusLineNC

2016-12-12 Fir de Conversatie Ozaki Kiichi
> Sorry, there's no need to add the test in Makefile because I added into > test_alot.vim. I fixed the patch. It is better to add it for an unit test. maka -C src test_fillchars -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you

Re: stl, stlnc of fillchars are not always applied, depends on difference between StatusLine and StatusLineNC

2016-12-12 Fir de Conversatie itchyny
> Thank you Bram. I've got the point. > How about this patch? > I noticed the note in syntax.txt but still believe that the patch solves the > strange behavior > that most people will not configure what's going on until look into the > source code. > Sorry, there's no need to add the test in

Re: stl, stlnc of fillchars are not always applied, depends on difference between StatusLine and StatusLineNC

2016-12-11 Fir de Conversatie ouidacisneros via vim_dev
On Mon, 12/12/16, maximabrowning via vim_dev wrote: Subject: Re: stl, stlnc of fillchars are not always applied, depends on difference between StatusLine and StatusLineNC To: vim_dev@googlegroups.com Date: Monday,

Re: stl, stlnc of fillchars are not always applied, depends on difference between StatusLine and StatusLineNC

2016-12-11 Fir de Conversatie maximabrowning via vim_dev
On Mon, 12/12/16, itchyny wrote: Subject: Re: stl, stlnc of fillchars are not always applied, depends on difference between StatusLine and StatusLineNC To: "vim_dev" Cc:

Re: stl, stlnc of fillchars are not always applied, depends on difference between StatusLine and StatusLineNC

2016-12-11 Fir de Conversatie itchyny
On Monday, December 12, 2016 at 2:28:51 AM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Ken Hamada wrote: > > > Hi list. I found a strange behavior of fillchars and StatusLine. > > > > vim -u NONE --cmd 'set fillchars=stl:\ ,stlnc:\ ' --cmd 'vnew' > > I set both stl and stlnc space so that I don't see any ^

Re: stl, stlnc of fillchars are not always applied, depends on difference between StatusLine and StatusLineNC

2016-12-11 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Ken Hamada wrote: > Hi list. I found a strange behavior of fillchars and StatusLine. > > vim -u NONE --cmd 'set fillchars=stl:\ ,stlnc:\ ' --cmd 'vnew' > I set both stl and stlnc space so that I don't see any ^ or = characters in > the statusline. > But when I set the following highlights, Vim

stl, stlnc of fillchars are not always applied, depends on difference between StatusLine and StatusLineNC

2016-12-11 Fir de Conversatie itchyny
Hi list. I found a strange behavior of fillchars and StatusLine. vim -u NONE --cmd 'set fillchars=stl:\ ,stlnc:\ ' --cmd 'vnew' I set both stl and stlnc space so that I don't see any ^ or = characters in the statusline. But when I set the following highlights, Vim draws the statusline of the