Matt Wozniski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:40 PM, James Vega wrote:
With Vim's current behavior, 'encoding' is derived from the environment
and 'fileencoding'/'termencoding' derive from 'encoding' (modulo
'fileencodings' affect on 'fenc'). This seems sub-optimal for various
reasons.
1)
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Mike Williams wrote:
Matt Wozniski wrote:
This sounds like a very good idea to me. I don't know of any other
programs that allow you to change encoding used internally, and we
would be in good company if we chose to always use a unicode encoding
Matt Wozniski wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Mike Williams wrote:
Matt Wozniski wrote:
This sounds like a very good idea to me. I don't know of any other
programs that allow you to change encoding used internally, and we
would be in good company if we chose to always use a unicode
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:38:44 +0100, Markus Heidelberg
markus.heidelb...@web.de wrote:
patch 7.2.137 has rewritten half of the function shift_block() in
src/ops.c. This is the part, which was heavily modified by the variable
tabstops patch, so that I ended up with a merge conflict. I will at
John Beckett, 09.03.2009:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
It's perhaps a bit strange to use :diffthis! to start diff
mode in other windows. :diffall would be more obvious.
It's not symmetric with :diffoff vs :diffoff!, but that
one doesn't say this.
What do you all think about using
