Re: Windows gvim build failure with old SDK

2017-12-14 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Mike Williams wrote: > I have just tried to bring my windows VIM builds up to date and find the > gvim build is failing with the following error: > > gui_dwrite.cpp(41) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: > 'dwrite_2.h': No such file or directory > > This started with patch 1343

Re: Windows gvim build failure with old SDK

2017-12-14 Fir de Conversatie Mike Williams
Hi On 14/12/2017 12:15, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Mike Williams wrote: I have just tried to bring my windows VIM builds up to date and find the gvim build is failing with the following error: gui_dwrite.cpp(41) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'dwrite_2.h': No such file or

Re: Substitutions in closed folds

2017-12-14 Fir de Conversatie 'Andy Wokula' via vim_dev
Am 13.12.2017 um 22:43 schrieb Gary Johnson: To follow up, here is what I did to fix the problematic function in my plugin. I added code above and below this line, which had been modifying every line in a closed fold instead of just l:lnum, silent exe l:lnum.'s/:.*/:\t'.strftime("%Y-%m-%d

Re: Substitutions in closed folds

2017-12-14 Fir de Conversatie Gary Johnson
On 2017-12-14, 'Andy Wokula' via vim_dev wrote: > Am 13.12.2017 um 22:43 schrieb Gary Johnson: > >To follow up, here is what I did to fix the problematic function in > >my plugin. I added code above and below this line, which had been > >modifying every line in a closed fold instead of just

Re: Recent netrw.vim update very buggy

2017-12-14 Fir de Conversatie Marius Gedminas
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 08:12:49PM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Marius Gedminas wrote: > > > I git pull vim's master a few times a week to test the latest features. > > Unfortunately it has recently become painful to use due to netrw's bugs. > > I keep finding my options (like 'nohidden',

Re: Recent netrw.vim update very buggy

2017-12-14 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Marius Gedminas wrote: > I git pull vim's master a few times a week to test the latest features. > Unfortunately it has recently become painful to use due to netrw's bugs. > I keep finding my options (like 'nohidden', but sometimes even 'readonly', > 'nomodifiable' and 'buftype') blatantly

Re: [vim/vim] Improve color emoji (#2401)

2017-12-14 Fir de Conversatie David Kotchan
On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 7:27:59 PM UTC-8, David Kotchan wrote: > OK I have re-pulled, and am now on the "optimize-directx" branch, which has > latest commit 9af94dbea8389a5e31a946f53d9d7a11561d1456, one commit after the > 0e7d0764 commit you mention above. I will try this branch (at

Re: [vim/vim] netrw 162m closes and deletes current window/buffer when opening directory (#2141)

2017-12-14 Fir de Conversatie Wei Zhang
As long as Dr. Chip works on a Windows pc for a week, he will find netrw is totally crap on Windows. 在 2017年12月15日星期五 UTC+8上午11:31:48,K.Takata写道: > Hi Dr. Chip, > > There are more than 20 issues related to netrw in this repository. > > You can easily find them by searching the plugin-netrw

Re: [vim/vim] netrw 162m closes and deletes current window/buffer when opening directory (#2141)

2017-12-14 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
On Do, 14 Dez 2017, Wei Zhang wrote: > As long as Dr. Chip works on a Windows pc for a week, he will find netrw is > totally crap on Windows. Perhaps you have a more constructive feedback? Christian -- Falten machen einen Mann männlicher, eine Frau älter. -- Jeanne Moreau --

Re: [vim/vim] Improve color emoji (#2401)

2017-12-14 Fir de Conversatie Ken Takata
Hi David, 2017/12/15 Fri 3:20:16 UTC+9 David Kotchan wrote: > On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 7:27:59 PM UTC-8, David Kotchan wrote: > > > OK I have re-pulled, and am now on the "optimize-directx" branch, which has > > latest commit 9af94dbea8389a5e31a946f53d9d7a11561d1456, one commit after

Recent netrw.vim update very buggy

2017-12-14 Fir de Conversatie Marius Gedminas
Hi! I git pull vim's master a few times a week to test the latest features. Unfortunately it has recently become painful to use due to netrw's bugs. I keep finding my options (like 'nohidden', but sometimes even 'readonly', 'nomodifiable' and 'buftype') blatantly changed behind my back, and