On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 8:31 PM Colin Kennedy wrote:
> Does :cc still honor the switchbuf=vsplit setting after this change?
>
> It’s nested in the PR replies currently but I think I asked whether we
> need this now in this PR and the consensus was to handle it as a horizontal
> split. If people
Yes, we should add that to the documentation for 'switchbuf'. We can always
remove the documentation later if/when 'switchbuf' is incorporated into the
split behavior. By the way though, I think only uselast is affected. I
don’t use vsplit personally but I think vsplit should still work just the
Does :cc still honor the switchbuf=vsplit setting after this change?
It’s nested in the PR replies currently but I think I asked whether we need
this now in this PR and the consensus was to handle it as a horizontal
split. If people want customizations, that can come in another revision. It
I think test coverage is good but I want to make sure we don't end up
chasing the coverage % as an absolute goal (which just shows *line*
coverage, not functionality coverage). I remember working on some PRs and
rewriting some tests, and discovered the tests I was modifying didn't make
too much
