Re: make distclean fails to remove src/config.cache

2013-06-23 Thread björn
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:10 PM, dv1...@wayne.edu wrote: On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:02:59PM +0200, björn wrote: On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:46 AM, dv1...@wayne.edu wrote: Could it be because MacVim has TWO 'configure' files of substance, while BramVim only has one? In MacVim repo:

Re: MacVim and Syntastic

2013-06-23 Thread björn
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Blake Sweeney wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:33:28PM +0200, björn wrote: It sounds a bit like it could be a bug in MacVim's implementation of the signs feature, but I don't ever use this myself so haven't noticed any problems. Can you create a minimal set

Re: broken getfontname()

2013-06-23 Thread Bee
On Friday, June 21, 2013 6:57:51 AM UTC-7, björn wrote: Thanks for the report. I've pushed a fix. On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Bee fo...@calcentral.com wrote: getfontname() seems broken is all versions of MacVim I compiled MacVim version 7.3.1233 from

Re: broken getfontname()

2013-06-23 Thread Bee
On Friday, June 21, 2013 6:57:51 AM UTC-7, björn wrote: Thanks for the report. I've pushed a fix. On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Bee wrote: getfontname() seems broken is all versions of MacVim I compiled MacVim version 7.3.1233 from https://github.com/b4winckler/macvim/ and

Re: make distclean fails to remove src/config.cache

2013-06-23 Thread Steven Michalske
On Jun 23, 2013, at 1:56 PM, gmn dv1...@wayne.edu wrote: I would certainly have done so, but not being a programmer, I didn't know that that is in fact the correct solution. For all I knew, there may have been a very good reason for there to be two different, meaty configure scripts.

Re: make distclean fails to remove src/config.cache

2013-06-23 Thread dv1445
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 04:13:44PM +0200, björn wrote: OK, I've restored the src/configure script from upstream now. Tested and works. Thanks again. -gmn -- -- You received this message from the vim_mac maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more