Re: MacOS X Carbon GUI build patch for 7.3f

2010-08-15 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Björn Winckler wrote: This does not look good (in os_macosx.m): #if defined(FEAT_CLIPBOARD) !defined(FEAT_GUI) It means the clipboard code will not get included when I compile MacVim (since it defines FEAT_GUI). I think you meant FEAT_GUI_MAC, right? Hmm, I suppose it's

Re: MacOS X Carbon GUI build patch for 7.3f

2010-08-14 Thread Bram Moolenaar
LC Mi wrote: For i386 only. Cannot compile current carbon gui code with 64bit. With the patch: diff --git a/src/gui_mac.c b/src/gui_mac.c --- a/src/gui_mac.c +++ b/src/gui_mac.c @@ -4606,7 +4606,7 @@ gui_clear_block(row, gui.scroll_region_left, row +

Re: MacOS X Carbon GUI build patch for 7.3f

2010-08-14 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Björn Winckler wrote: On 14 August 2010 21:55, Bram Moolenaar wrote: LC Mi wrote: Another configuration issue is --with-mac-arch=i386 doesn't work on 10.6. --with-mac-arch=i386 completely fails. The default build is x86_64, but gui_mac.c doesn't work with 64bit build. So my

Re: MacOS X Carbon GUI build patch for 7.3f

2010-08-14 Thread björn
On 14 August 2010 22:07, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Björn Winckler wrote: On 14 August 2010 21:55, Bram Moolenaar wrote: LC Mi wrote: Another configuration issue is --with-mac-arch=i386 doesn't work on 10.6. --with-mac-arch=i386 completely fails. The default build is x86_64, but

Re: MacOS X Carbon GUI build patch for 7.3f

2010-08-14 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Björn Winckler wrote: On 14 August 2010 22:07, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Björn Winckler wrote: On 14 August 2010 21:55, Bram Moolenaar wrote: LC Mi wrote: Another configuration issue is --with-mac-arch=i386 doesn't work on 10.6. --with-mac-arch=i386 completely fails.

Re: MacOS X Carbon GUI build patch for 7.3f

2010-08-14 Thread björn
On 15 August 2010 00:07, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Björn Winckler wrote: This does not look good (in os_macosx.m): #if defined(FEAT_CLIPBOARD) !defined(FEAT_GUI) It means the clipboard code will not get included when I compile MacVim (since it defines FEAT_GUI).  I think you meant