On 11/04/10 22:16, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Christian Brabandt wrote:
Are you considering any patches from
http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/web/vim-patches
for inclusion?
Yes, but many of these patches are not mature. E.g., first one,
Improved regular expression engine, is still lacking
Nicholas Cole wrote:
#14 (Vince Negri's conceal/ownsyntax/cursorbind) already has
a long track record.
This thread has been a good reminder to renew my sponsorship,
in part because Vim deserves the support, and in part so I can
vote again for this patch! I've never been clear why this
Awesome! But why Mercurial? Git seems to be a good choice these days because
of its flexibility and a lot of open source projects host their code for
free on git hub. I moved my projects over to Git from svn, and despite the
initial learning curve (we as vim users know about that), I have really
On 11/04/10 16:33, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
It would also be nice if we can update the spell files. Volunteers
wanted! See $VIMRUNTIME/spell/README.txt, the MAINTAINING A LANGUAGE
section.
IIUC, Mozilla uses the same spellfile format as Vim? If that's the case,
and if the Mozilla
Christian Brabandt wrote:
Are you considering any patches from
http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/web/vim-patches
for inclusion?
Yes, but many of these patches are not mature. E.g., first one,
Improved regular expression engine, is still lacking the tests to
verify that it doesn't break
