On the contrary. vim-wikia was started specifically BECAUSE the original
vim tips, hosted on vim.org, were seeing excessive amounts of spam, and
it was too hard to deal with the spam.
Let's not forget (IIRC :): When the spam tips started, you could post tips
without logging in which is sort
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 5:13:54 AM UTC+1, Paul wrote:
I think I'm missing something. I have it stored as
c:/Users/USERNAME/Documents/vimfiles/plugin/filejump.vim, and I've since
restarted gvim. It's still switching files sometimes. I need to read more
about plugins to confirm that
Excerpts from Benjamin Klein's message of Mon Jan 27 16:57:57 +0100 2014:
how do you plan to combat spam?
What has been the issue with vim.sf.net - it was not even possible to
activate accounts by forcing users to click on links in mails.
There are two kinds of spammers:
- bots
- human users
Glenn Todd Miller replied to my post by e-mail, because he wanted to include
screenshots.
They demonstrate that he is using
:inoremap ScrollWheelDown nop
but as I suggested be checked out, Glenn is getting ^[OA and ^[OB arrow key
sequences when the mouse wheel is used.
What could be
I'm adding a little to what Ben wrote.
It is a shame about adverts at vim.wikia.com (although I never
see them), but as Ben noted, the ads pay for a good server and a
fast internet connection, and support. Also, there is a
practically guaranteed continuity to the site because even if
Ben and I
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 5:33:37 AM UTC-5, JohnBeckett wrote:
I'm adding a little to what Ben wrote.
It is a shame about adverts at vim.wikia.com (although I never
see them), but as Ben noted, the ads pay for a good server and a
fast internet connection, and support. Also,
Excerpts from tawheed abdul-raheeem's message of Wed Jan 29 02:23:50 +0100 2014:
I haven't seen a single spam commit on my wiki yet. And if it happens
I dont doubt that but that is probably because it has not yet gained a
lot of traction from the community and also web bots.
Web bots will have
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 8:52:27 AM UTC-6, tawheed abdul-raheeem wrote:
It would be better if everyone concentrated on one site IMHO,
but people have given good reasons why they prefer something
else.
Great point John, it is important that we have one and only one account that
