> Usability takes thought and deliberation. Every time someone asks for
> a random feature the solution should not be "let's add a new
> :dothisonething command".
Agreed. The approach should be "What is the general case, of which this is
a particular example?". Then you only have to solve the cla
On 2017-02-09, Justin M. Keyes wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Sylvain Leroux wrote:
> > Thank you for your reply Bram,
> > And more generally thank you for your great work & continuous
> > involvement with Vim.
> >
> >
> > Some comments inline:
> >
> > On 02/09/2017 04:06 PM, Bram Moolen
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Sylvain Leroux wrote:
> Thank you for your reply Bram,
> And more generally thank you for your great work & continuous
> involvement with Vim.
>
>
> Some comments inline:
>
> On 02/09/2017 04:06 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>> I don't think it can be done with one comm
Thank you for your reply Bram,
And more generally thank you for your great work & continuous
involvement with Vim.
Some comments inline:
On 02/09/2017 04:06 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> I don't think it can be done with one command. Simplest seems to be to
> copy the text and then filter it.
>
Hi list,
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 04:06:34PM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Would not be a bad idea to have an Ex command for this. Not sure what
> to call it, :feed perhaps? :writeread ?
why not implementing it as a command that pipes the selection into the
command, and pipes the output into a
Sylvain Leroux wrote:
> I finally decided to post here as I can't find the solution by myself.
> I'm looking for a way to use some range of the buffer as input to an
> external command, and *inserting* the command output into the buffer.
>
> I'm aware of the `!` command but it doesn't match my n
