How to use non-monospace in gVim? Only monospace fonts are displayed
in font list.
On 19 апр, 13:17, Tony Mechelynck antoine.mechely...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 19/04/11 09:36, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Monospace fonts... That's very said. Thank you for explanation.
If you mean very sad, this is
Add this to the top of your .vimrc file:
filetype off
call pathogen#runtime_append_all_bundles() Pathogen hack
call pathogen#helptags()
filetype plugin indent on Enable file-type indentation
It's important that the pathogen stuff is before the filetype plugin indent
on because
On Thu, April 21, 2011 8:15 am, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
How to use non-monospace in gVim? Only monospace fonts are displayed
in font list.
You can't on Windows.
regards,
Christian
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you
On Thu, April 21, 2011 1:40 am, Adam Monsen wrote:
+multibyte
Just a small nit: this should be +multi_byte.
True.
And there is no standard lucid vim package of Vim 7.3. Looks like
only natty has Vim 7.3.
Yes, somehow the original poster must have gotten some non official
packages for
Hi,
Currently my workflow replacing a visual selection is like this:
1. Go to Visual mode
2. Select text
3. y'ank
4. :%s/c-r*/foo/g
One problem with this workflow I have to check if my selected text contains
special characters I have to escape (e.g. /).
Can this workflow be optimized further
Kai Weber wrote:
1. Go to Visual mode
2. Select text
3. y'ank
4. :%s/c-r*/foo/g
One problem with this workflow I have to check if my selected
text contains special characters I have to escape (e.g. /).
I use this tip:
http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Search_for_visually_selected_text
That tip is
* Kai Weber [2011.04.21 07:10]:
Hi,
Currently my workflow replacing a visual selection is like this:
1. Go to Visual mode
2. Select text
3. y'ank
4. :%s/c-r*/foo/g
How about:
1. go to visual mode
2. select text
3. press c
--
JR
--
You received this message from the vim_use
Thanks all.
Yes its weird, according to dpkg I have 7.2x and this is indeed the binary at
/usr/bin/vim.basic
which I ran for the first time a few seconds ago.
Normally I run the binary /usr/local/bin/vim which is 7.3
I do not remember how I achieved this - sorry.
Anyway it has been compiled
On 04/21/2011 07:37 AM, Jean-Rene David wrote:
Currently my workflow replacing a visual selection is like this:
1. Go to Visual mode
2. Select text
3. y'ank
4. :%s/c-r*/foo/g
How about:
1. go to visual mode
2. select text
3. press c
This only does the match under the cursor
Hi Andy,
On Wednesday 20 Apr 2011 11:26:06 Andy Wokula wrote:
Am 19.04.2011 10:59, schrieb Shlomi Fish:
Hi all,
I prepared a partial syntax file for Screenplay-Text here:
http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/web-cpan/XML-Grammar-Fiction/trunk/vi
m
It's attached to this message.
Ok I was looking in another approach...more objects.
Maybe I can use elseif like Ben says for instant.
Thank you
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit
Taylor Hedberg wrote:
Ben Fritz, Wed 2011-04-20 @ 17:26:49-0700:
Not having used Pathogen, I don't know how to work installation using
it.
Pathogen creates a new directory bundle/ underneath your .vim/
directory. You then place the entire directory structure for a plugin in
a
Charles Campbell, Thu 2011-04-21 @ 16:56:30-0400:
I agree that pathogen makes plugins easier to remove if the plugin is
not in vimball format. With vimball format, its simply :RmVimball
pluginname , so the two methods are about equally easy to use as
regards plugin removal.
Insofar as
On 21/04/11 08:15, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
How to use non-monospace in gVim? Only monospace fonts are displayed
in font list.
On gvim with GTK2 GUI (only on X11), you can but it's ugly because the
variable-width glyphs are displayed within constant-width screen cells.
If you really want
Hi,
I use:
set efm=%EError%.%#,%C%f\\,\ %l,%C%.%#,%Z%m
to filter error messages like the following lines:
*Error-[MFNF] Member not found
/users/jianzhen/core_tb_20110419_/verif/drv.sv, 113
this.m_drive_req_event.
Could not find member 'triggered' in class 'event', at
Suppose that I do a pattern search and the search function returns
the location into a variable xxx. e.g.
let xxx = search(pat,flags,line('y))
and *later* , not immediatly, in the script I'd like to do something like
continue my script at xxx or
print the line at xxx (i.e.
On 22/04/11 05:04, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Suppose that I do a pattern search and the search function returns
the location into a variable xxx. e.g.
let xxx = search(pat,flags,line('y))
and *later* , not immediatly, in the script I'd like to do something like
continue my script at xxx or
print
Thanks Tony. Your suggestion helps!
After reading the manual more carefully, I find the solution.
-- --
Best Regards
Jerry Dai
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Tony Mechelynck
antoine.mechely...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/04/11 04:16, Jerry Dai wrote:
Hi,
I use:
set
On 04/20/2011 06:02 PM, Tim Chase wrote:
While I don't know what other folks use, and I don't do it myself,
this one-liner can be made into a :command! or mapped to make it
pretty easy/straight-forward:
:%s/^\(.*\)\\s*\(\*[^*]*\*\)$/\=printf('%s%*s', submatch(1),
You've this mistake before, right?
cat /tmp/foo.txt | vim
when you meant to do
cat /tmp/foo.txt | vim -
Somewhere early in my Vim learning I figured out the latter, so I
usually don't repeat the mistake.
But why *is* that even a mistake? What is the purpose/origin/history
of the first
But why *is* that even a mistake? What is the purpose/origin/history
of the first example, the vim sans-dash behavior?
Whoops, I should have searched a bit more before posting.
I found
:help 26.4
so I understand that the sans-dash calling convention is most useful
when using Vim in batch
On 22/04/11 07:36, Adam Monsen wrote:
You've this mistake before, right?
cat /tmp/foo.txt | vim
when you meant to do
cat /tmp/foo.txt | vim -
Somewhere early in my Vim learning I figured out the latter, so I
usually don't repeat the mistake.
But why *is* that even a mistake? What is
22 matches
Mail list logo
