Hi,
I use:
vim 7.3.244 (gentoo) and for some time :verbose command is not giving the info
where function/command/map/etc... was defined. This is a useful feature, and
I'd like to get it back? Any ideas?
Best,
Marcin
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type
2011/7/26 Marcin Szamotulski msza...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I use:
vim 7.3.244 (gentoo) and for some time :verbose command is not giving the info
where function/command/map/etc... was defined. This is a useful feature, and
I'd like to get it back? Any ideas?
Best,
Marcin
Hi,
Try to set the
when debugging ..
--
BEST WISHES!
许旭柱
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
On 10:12 Tue 26 Jul , Karol Samborski wrote:
2011/7/26 Marcin Szamotulski msza...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I use:
vim 7.3.244 (gentoo) and for some time :verbose command is not giving the
info
where function/command/map/etc... was defined. This is a useful feature, and
I'd like to get it
On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:53 PM, ZyX wrote:
Reply to message «Re: Plugin/addon managers»,
sent 19:40:48 25 July 2011, Monday
by Eric Weir:
The VAM zip package is in /.vam. Your instructions say to cd into
vim-addon-manager before executing the unzip command. When I got the above
result, I
Reply to message «Re: Installing a word count plugin -- or recommendations of
other plugins»,
sent 18:35:01 26 July 2011, Tuesday
by Arthur Lee:
You should not use :normal without a bang in a plugin (it may be the cause).
And you don't need any script-local variables here:
function
ZyX,
Thanks for your post. But there still be some error pop up when reopen the
macvim.
Error detected while processing function WordCount:
line 4:
E684: list index out of range: 11
--
It seems the gc-g command does not execute at all!
Any suggestion will be appreciate. Thanks.!
--
Reply to message «Re: Installing a word count plugin -- or recommendations of
other plugins»,
sent 19:06:48 26 July 2011, Tuesday
by Arthur Lee:
It seems the gc-g command does not execute at all!
Any suggestion will be appreciate. Thanks.!
Read :debug. I have no suggestions about what may be
It took me quite some time to figure this out, so I thought I'd share.
Perhaps someone knows a good workaround.
:help :let-@ says
If the result of {expr1} ends in a CR or NL, the
register will be linewise, otherwise it will be set to
Hi,
Each time that I open a new vimfile of my own or another existing one,
the saving action (:w!) takes more and more time after each new saving
command.
I suppose it comes from autocommand written in my _vimrc.
Thank you for helping,
Let see:
Only do this part when compiled with support for
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, niva wrote:
Hi,
Each time that I open a new vimfile of my own or another existing one,
the saving action (:w!) takes more and more time after each new saving
command.
I suppose it comes from autocommand written in my _vimrc.
Thank you for helping,
Let see:
Only do
Well done !
Thank you for all !!
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Reply to message «unexpected behavior of :let-@»,
sent 20:36:08 26 July 2011, Tuesday
by Ben Fritz:
Not related to documentation fix, but you can use `setreg()' to avoid this
behavior.
By the way, while
let @/=
clears the last search pattern, using `n' for some reason results in
E486:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, ZyX wrote:
Reply to message «unexpected behavior of :let-@»,
sent 20:36:08 26 July 2011, Tuesday
by Ben Fritz:
By the way, while
let @/=
clears the last search pattern, using `n' for some reason results in
E486: Pattern not found: ^M
Interesting. I get that under
Reply to message «Re: unexpected behavior of :let-@»,
sent 22:05:57 26 July 2011, Tuesday
by Benjamin R. Haskell:
It is a last substitute search pattern which causes this behavior. I forgot
that
there are two «last search» patterns that vim remembers. Script to reproduce:
vim -u NONE -i
Ack - sorry I thought you were someone else. Sorry about that.
On 25 Jul 2011, at 20:48, AK wrote:
I have a function where I added some debug echo messages but they don't seem
to show up. The function runs in insert mode. The debug messages neither show
up on screen or in :messages listing.
On Jul 26, 12:57 pm, ZyX zyx@gmail.com wrote:
Reply to message «unexpected behavior of :let-@»,
sent 20:36:08 26 July 2011, Tuesday
by Ben Fritz:
Not related to documentation fix, but you can use `setreg()' to avoid this
behavior.
Nice! I'd forgotten about setreg(), finding it
I think this is a bug. With ambiwidth=double, the unicode character '₀'
(U+2080,
the subscript '0') is single-width, but '₁-₉' (U+2081-U+2089, subscripts
1-9) are double-width.
From my reading of http://unicode.org/reports/tr11/, none of these
characters should be considered to be of
On 27/07/11 00:26, Tobbe Lundberg wrote:
Does anyone know of any attempts at making gvim (for MS Windows) look
more modern? (Using a standard gui border for split windows, a
gui-window for completion lists, a standard gui status bar, etc)
If something like this doesn't already exist, would
See if this works for you.
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=120
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 15:26 -0700, Tobbe Lundberg wrote:
Does anyone know of any attempts at making gvim (for MS Windows)
look more modern? (Using a standard gui border for split windows, a
gui-window for completion lists, a standard gui status bar, etc)
If something like this doesn't
thank for your reply.
after reading your reply, i just know it is an issue of OS instead of
vim. so i won't try to find an answer to vim itself.
On 7月26日, 上午10时47分, Tony Mechelynck antoine.mechely...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 25/07/11 05:36,waremwrote:
hi,
i am using gvim in M$. i would like to
22 matches
Mail list logo
