I need the chips for the macintosh se that way I can use my superdrive. They
are the same chips used In the se fdhd.
--
--
-
You received this message because you are a member of the Vintage Macs group.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/vintagemacs.shtml and our
netiquette
On Sun, 8/11/13, Triston Mccarthy moogleboogle...@gmail.com wrote:
Subject: SE superdrive roms
To: vintage-macs@googlegroups.com
Date: Sunday, August 11, 2013, 11:25 AM
I need the chips for the macintosh se
that way I can use my superdrive. They are the same chips
used In the se fdhd.
This is not your normal post. I have a probably one-of-a-kind ROM SIMM.
When placed in my SE/30, a risk I took based on the age and shape of the
ROM, it booted. There was nothing out of the ordinary about the operation
with the SIMM clipped in. But the SIMM says Erickson ROM 1.04b, 6/19/90
You should be able to first check if its a 32 bit clean Rom first that will
help narrow it down. I would bet it would be.
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:37:49 -0700
From: garriso...@yahoo.com
To: vintage-macs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Expert Vintage Member's Input Needed
This is not your normal
I know I thought I actually said I needed the two roms and the swim. Must have
been another message. I think it was 342-0701 hi 342-0702 low and some other
god awful number to the swim.
--
--
-
You received this message because you are a member of the Vintage Macs group.
The list FAQ is
On Aug 11, 2013, at 3:37 PM, The Old Geek garriso...@yahoo.com wrote:
But the SIMM says Erickson ROM 1.04b, 6/19/90
The Macintosh IIsi was codenamed Erickson and released in October 1990. So
I'd say it's most likely a IIsi ROM.
- Dylan
--
--
-
You received this message because you are
oh yeah, man, good catch dylan!
On Aug 11, 2013, at 7:18 PM, Dylan McDermond wrote:
On Aug 11, 2013, at 3:37 PM, The Old Geek garriso...@yahoo.com wrote:
But the SIMM says Erickson ROM 1.04b, 6/19/90
The Macintosh IIsi was codenamed Erickson and released in October 1990. So
I'd say
There's the home run I was looking for! Thanks, Dylan, you've earned your
stripes in the knowledge department.
Next phase of the dilemma would be, since the IIsi was already 32 bit clean,
what was this experimental ROM SIMM intended to do?
Guess I'd need a working IIsi to go there.
Jeff
And BTW, I've had a number of IIsi Macs go through my hands over the years and
have never seen ONE ROM SIMM in all the ones
I've refurbished. Wonder if they're compatible? And why didn't the SE/30
complain when it was asked to boot with the SIMM in it's socket?
Jeff
I gather that ROMs for 030 based Macs are backwards compatible to a fair
degree, e.g. a IIcx can boot, 32 bit clean, from a IIsi ROM.
- Jonathan Morton
On 12 Aug 2013 03:51, J.S. Garrison garriso...@yahoo.com wrote:
And BTW, I've had a number of IIsi Macs go through my hands over the
years and
On Aug 11, 2013, at 5:51 PM, J.S. Garrison garriso...@yahoo.com wrote:
And BTW, I've had a number of IIsi Macs go through my hands over the years
and have never seen ONE ROM SIMM in all the ones
I've refurbished. Wonder if they're compatible? And why didn't the SE/30
complain when it was
But like the IIfx, finding a ROM in the IIsi socket is like hen's teeth. Worse,
I suspect, as I've never seen one in 19 years
of Mac-collecting.
Jeff
From: Jonathan Morton chromati...@gmail.com
To: vintage-macs@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013
Well, I know they had the spring-clip for a ROM. The website,
vectronicsappleworld.com, on it's IIsi page says: It may be possible to turn a
Macintosh SE/30 into a clean 32-bit system by using a IIsi ROM SIMM. Thus,
collectors
are always on the look out for the presence of a IIsi ROM SIMM
13 matches
Mail list logo
