At 11:51 PM 04/05/2002 -0800, you wrote:
9.1 is OK on a 110Mhz 601 PowerMac but on a 100Mhz
Power IIci with its 25Mhz bus speed would be
torture that not even an Al Queda terrorist should
be subjected to. ;-) duck-n-run!
Thank you, Gregg. That's pretty much what I thought I was reading
There has been a thread that implies that the battery-backed PRAM has two
strengths; that is, it takes longer for non-powered PRAM to forget
the board's manufacture date and hours-in-use than it does for it to forget
standard settings like color-depth and mouse-speed. Is this correct?
At 12:38 PM -0500 4/6/02, Robert Patterson wrote:
There has been a thread that implies that the battery-backed PRAM has two
strengths; that is, it takes longer for non-powered PRAM to forget
the board's manufacture date and hours-in-use than it does for it to forget
standard settings like
--
From: Teri Pittman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vintage Macs)
Subject: Re: Another IIci question
Date: Sat, Apr 6, 2002, 6:12 AM
At 11:51 PM 04/05/2002 -0800, you wrote:
9.1 is OK on a 110Mhz 601 PowerMac but on a 100Mhz
Power IIci with its 25Mhz bus speed would be
At 12:38 -0500 on 06/04/02, Robert Patterson wrote:
There has been a thread that implies that the battery-backed PRAM has two
strengths; that is, it takes longer for non-powered PRAM to forget
the board's manufacture date and hours-in-use than it does for it to forget
standard settings like
--- Teri Pittman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you, Gregg. That's pretty much what I thought
I was reading (except
I wasn't aware of the OS versions involved). I'm
starting to think the
wisest course for this IIci is to max it out on RAM,
play around with it a
bit, and keep my eye out
--- J.S. Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Y'know, I'm dumbfounded at this one.
I have a 6100/66av that ran OS 9.1 just fine. Even
went to iTunes radio
stations that would broadcast in my speed-zone,
(28.8k), and got music hiccupingly.
Now with the Newer 240Mhz. card in it, I have no
Teri Pittman wrote:
I'm starting to think the
wisest course for this IIci is to max it out on RAM, play around with it a
bit, and keep my eye out for a cheap Power Mac or G3 or 4.
A lot less costly but very much worth the effort is the addition of an '030
accellerator card like the 'Diimo 030
At 09:29 PM 4/6/2002 -0800, you wrote:
I'm starting to think the
wisest course for this IIci is to max it out on RAM, play around with it a
bit, and keep my eye out for a cheap Power Mac or G3 or 4.
A lot less costly but very much worth the effort is the addition of an '030
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mart)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vintage Macs)
Subject: Re: Another IIci question
Date: Sat, Apr 6, 2002, 7:31 PM
Teri Pittman wrote:
I'm starting to think the
wisest course for this IIci is to max it out on RAM, play around with it a
bit, and keep my eye out
At 21:54 -0800 on 06/04/02, J.S. Garrison wrote:
A lot less costly but very much worth the effort is the addition of an '030
accellerator card like the 'Diimo 030 cache card'. Runs on 50 Mhz. Got one
in here; makes the OS 7.1 on this IIci really zippy :)
-mart
I'm kinda spoiled. I like
how do,
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Clark Martin wrote:
AFAIK, no it forgets everything equally. What has been said is that
a PRAM ZAP DOESN'T clear the Manf date and hours-in-use but that a
dead or pulled battery clears all.
so would not so equally be what we call corrupted pram?
What got
--- the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 21:54 -0800 on 06/04/02, J.S. Garrison wrote:
A lot less costly but very much worth the effort
is the addition of an '030
accellerator card like the 'Diimo 030 cache
card'. Runs on 50 Mhz. Got one
in here; makes the OS 7.1 on this IIci really
13 matches
Mail list logo
