RE: a tap tap see rant

2014-02-02 Thread Pinky
To: viphone@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: a tap tapt see rant Jerry, I think a lot of people still find Tap Tap See useful, get good information and don’t mind the fact that sometimes what comes back is not perfect. The fact is that Tap Tap See occurs the cost of the image recognition whether

Re: a tap tap see rant

2014-02-02 Thread Alan Paganelli
] On Behalf Of Sieghard Weitzel Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 12:41 AM To: viphone@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: a tap tapt see rant Jerry, I think a lot of people still find Tap Tap See useful, get good information and don’t mind the fact that sometimes what comes back is not perfect

Re: a tap tap see rant

2014-02-02 Thread Nimit
:41 AM To: viphone@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: a tap tapt see rant Jerry, I think a lot of people still find Tap Tap See useful, get good information and don’t mind the fact that sometimes what comes back is not perfect. The fact is that Tap Tap See occurs the cost of the image

RE: a tap tap see rant

2014-02-02 Thread Sieghard Weitzel
certainly is not very constructive. Regards, Sieghard From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Pinky Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 11:58 AM To: viphone@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: a tap tap see rant Viphone lister’s I too would like to be able

RE: a tap tap see rant

2014-02-02 Thread Jerry Mader
@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Alan Paganelli Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 3:40 PM To: viphone@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: a tap tap see rant I think we vote with our dollars. If Tap Tap See were a paid app from the get_go, that would be one thing. I don't

Re: a tap tap see rant

2014-02-02 Thread Kay Malmquist
outright and people do have the right to state their opinions. Kay- Original Message - From: Nimit To: viphone@googlegroups.com Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 3:01 PM Subject: Re: a tap tap see rant Hi! First I have respect for everyone in this list so please understand