On 22/03/18 09:44, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 9:14 PM
>>
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> Thanks for the comments
>>
>> On 19/03/18 10:03, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>> BYPASS feature bit is not covered in
> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 9:14 PM
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Thanks for the comments
>
> On 19/03/18 10:03, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > BYPASS feature bit is not covered in "2.3.1/2.3.2/2.3.3"". Is it
> > intended?
>
> In my
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the comments
On 19/03/18 10:03, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> BYPASS feature bit is not covered in "2.3.1/2.3.2/2.3.3"". Is it
> intended?
In my opinion BYPASS is a bit different from the other features: while the
others are needed for correctness, this one is optional and even if
> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker
> Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 2:11 AM
>
> Please find version 0.6 of the virtio-iommu specification at the following
> locations.
>
> Document: http://jpbrucker.net/virtio-iommu/spec/virtio-iommu.pdf
>
Please find version 0.6 of the virtio-iommu specification at the following
locations.
Document: http://jpbrucker.net/virtio-iommu/spec/virtio-iommu.pdf
http://jpbrucker.net/virtio-iommu/spec/virtio-iommu.html
Sources: git://linux-arm.org/virtio-iommu.git viommu/v0.6
I didn't receive
