Re: [RFC PATCH v3 19/19] smp, x86: kill SMP single function call interrupt

2013-12-15 Thread Jiang Liu
Hi Sebastian, Thanks for your review. The patch applies to the mainstream kernel, so seems there's difference between tip and the mainstream kernel. I will try to find the difference. And there's another patch for Xen, but I found the mail tile is wrong:( Please refer to:

[PATCH v3 [resend] 14/18] smp, x86, xen: kill SMP single function call interrupt

2013-12-15 Thread Jiang Liu
Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic similar to smp_call_function_single() has unified the way to handle single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one interrupt is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function call interfaces, so

[PATCH v3 [resend] 15/18] smp, x86: kill SMP single function call interrupt

2013-12-15 Thread Jiang Liu
Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic similar to smp_call_function_single() has unified the way to handle single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one interrupt is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function call interfaces, so

Re: [PATCH v3 [resend] 14/18] smp, x86, xen: kill SMP single function call interrupt

2013-12-15 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:36:36AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic similar to smp_call_function_single() has unified the way to handle single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one interrupt is needed for architecture

RE: [PATCH v3 [resend] 14/18] smp, x86, xen: kill SMP single function call interrupt

2013-12-15 Thread Liu, Jinsong
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:36:36AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic similar to smp_call_function_single() has unified the way to handle single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one interrupt