Re: [PATCH v3 REPOST] xen-netfront: delay gARP until backend switches to Connected

2011-12-09 Thread David Miller
From: Ian Campbell Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 21:23:00 + > On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 18:45 +, David Miller wrote: >> From: Laszlo Ersek >> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 12:38:58 +0100 >> >> > These two together provide complete ordering. Sub-condition (1) is >> > satisfied by pvops commit 43223efd9bfd.

Re: [PATCH v3 REPOST] xen-netfront: delay gARP until backend switches to Connected

2011-12-09 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 18:45 +, David Miller wrote: > From: Laszlo Ersek > Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 12:38:58 +0100 > > > These two together provide complete ordering. Sub-condition (1) is > > satisfied by pvops commit 43223efd9bfd. > > I don't see this commit in Linus's tree, The referenced co

Re: [PATCH v3 REPOST] xen-netfront: delay gARP until backend switches to Connected

2011-12-09 Thread David Miller
From: Laszlo Ersek Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 12:38:58 +0100 > These two together provide complete ordering. Sub-condition (1) is > satisfied by pvops commit 43223efd9bfd. I don't see this commit in Linus's tree, so I doubt it's valid for me to apply this as a bug fix to my 'net' tree since the prec

[PATCH v3 REPOST] xen-netfront: delay gARP until backend switches to Connected

2011-12-09 Thread Laszlo Ersek
After a guest is live migrated, the xen-netfront driver emits a gratuitous ARP message, so that networking hardware on the target host's subnet can take notice, and public routing to the guest is re-established. However, if the packet appears on the backend interface before the backend is added to

Re: [PATCH RFC V3 2/4] kvm hypervisor : Add a hypercall to KVM hypervisor to support pv-ticketlocks

2011-12-09 Thread Raghavendra K T
On 12/08/2011 03:10 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 12/07/2011 06:46 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote: On 12/07/2011 08:22 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 12/07/2011 03:39 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: Also I think we can keep the kicked flag in vcpu->requests, no need for new storage. Was going to suggest it but i

Re: [PATCH 0/11] RFC: PCI using capabilitities

2011-12-09 Thread Rusty Russell
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:37:37 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > Which leads me to the question: Are MMIO vs MMIO reads/writes not > ordered? That seems really odd, especially being repeatable. BTW, that's an address, not a pfn now. Cheers, Rusty. ___ Virtual

Re: [net-next RFC PATCH 0/5] Series short description

2011-12-09 Thread Rusty Russell
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 17:02:04 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Solarflare controllers (sfc driver) have 8192 perfect filters for > TCP/IPv4 and UDP/IPv4 which can be used for flow steering. (The filters > are organised as a hash table, but matched based on 5-tuples.) I > implemented the 'accelerated

Re: [PATCH] virtio-ring: Use threshold for switching to indirect descriptors

2011-12-09 Thread Rusty Russell
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 12:37:48 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:14 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 17:48:17 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin" > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 04:02:45PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 20:23 +0200, Sa