> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:10 PM Saurabh Sengar
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This set of patches expands the VMBus driver to include device tree
> > > > > support.
> > > > >
> > > > > The first tw
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 06:04:49PM -0800, Saurabh Singh Sengar wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:27:51PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:10 PM Saurabh Sengar
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > This set of patches expands the VMBus driver to
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 03:10:10PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> Further cleanup of the vmbus driver:
>
> 1) Cleanup the interrupt handler by inlining some code.
>
> 2) Ensure message handling is performed on the same CPU that
> takes the vmbus interr
Further cleanup of the vmbus driver:
1) Cleanup the interrupt handler by inlining some code.
2) Ensure message handling is performed on the same CPU that
takes the vmbus interrupt.
3) Check for events before messages (from the host).
4) Disable auto
On some loaded windows hosts, we have discovered that the host may not
respond to guest requests within the specified time (one second)
as evidenced by the guest timing out. Fix this problem by increasing
the timeout to 5 seconds.
It may be useful to apply this patch to the 3.0 kernel as well.
zat...@lists.osdl.org
> Subject: RE: vmbus driver
>
> On Mon, 23 May 2011, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > I am working on getting Hyper-V drivers (drivers/staging/hv/*) out of
> > staging.
> > I would like to request you to look at the Hyper-V timesource driver:
> > drive
On Mon, 23 May 2011, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> I am working on getting Hyper-V drivers (drivers/staging/hv/*) out of staging.
> I would like to request you to look at the Hyper-V timesource driver:
> drivers/staging/hv/hv_timesource.c. The supporting code for this driver
> is already part of the base
> -Original Message-
> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:h...@infradead.org]
> Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 7:00 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig; gre...@suse.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:h...@infradead.org]
> Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 7:00 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig; gre...@suse.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org
&g
> I see maintainers for each of the clocksource drivers and I see John Stultz
> and
> Thomas Gleixner listed as the maintainers for Timekeeping. Who should
> sign-off
> on the Hyper-V clocksource.
just send it to both of the with linux-kernel in Cc, and either of them
will probably put it in.
t; Subject: Re: vmbus driver
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:12:32PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > Well, the util driver that implements a range of other services such as KVP,
> > time synch, heartbeat etc. is also a client of the vmbus driver (perhaps
> > not in
> the
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:h...@infradead.org]
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 8:27 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: gre...@suse.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org
> Subject: Re: vmb
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:12:32PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> Well, the util driver that implements a range of other services such as KVP,
> time synch, heartbeat etc. is also a client of the vmbus driver (perhaps not
> in the
The KVP driver is a different module as far as I can
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg KH [mailto:g...@kroah.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 9:05 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: gre...@suse.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org
> Subject: Re: vmbus driver
>
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:h...@infradead.org]
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 8:27 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: gre...@suse.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org
> Subject: Re: vmb
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 03:06:25PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
>
> Greg,
>
> A few days ago you applied all the outstanding patches for the Hyper-V
> drivers. With these patches, I have addressed all of the known review
> comments for the vmbus driver (and a lot of commen
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 03:06:25PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> A few days ago you applied all the outstanding patches for the Hyper-V
> drivers. With these patches, I have addressed all of the known review
> comments for the vmbus driver (and a lot of comments/issues in other
>
Greg,
A few days ago you applied all the outstanding patches for the Hyper-V
drivers. With these patches, I have addressed all of the known review
comments for the vmbus driver (and a lot of comments/issues in other
drivers as well). I am still hoping I can address
whatever other issues
Include the new header files in vmbus driver.
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan
Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kane
Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen
---
drivers/staging/hv/channel.c |6 +++---
drivers/staging/hv/channel_mgmt.c |7 +++
drivers/staging/hv
ect: Re: [PATCH 00/25] Staging: hv: Cleanup vmbus driver code
>
> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:16:36PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > That assumes libata is a module, which it is not for many popular
> > > distributions.
> > >
> > As long as you can prevent ata_
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:16:36PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > That assumes libata is a module, which it is not for many popular
> > distributions.
> >
> As long as you can prevent ata_piix from loading, it should be fine.
Again, this might very well be built in, e.g. take a look at:
http://
.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] Staging: hv: Cleanup vmbus driver code
>
> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 07:48:38PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > By setting up appropriate modprobe rules, this can be addressed.
>
> That assumes libata is a module, which it is not for many popular
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 07:48:38PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> By setting up appropriate modprobe rules, this can be addressed.
That assumes libata is a module, which it is not for many popular
distributions.
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualiza
ect: Re: [PATCH 00/25] Staging: hv: Cleanup vmbus driver code
>
> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:08:37PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > Could you elaborate on the problems/issues when the block driver registers
> > for
> the
> > IDE majors. On the Qemu side, we have a mechanis
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:08:37PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> Could you elaborate on the problems/issues when the block driver registers
> for the
> IDE majors. On the Qemu side, we have a mechanism to disable the emulation
> when
> PV drivers load. I don't think there is an equivalent mecha
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:56:58PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > Yeah, it seems to me that no matter how the user specifies the disk
> > "type" for the guest configuration, we should use the same Linux driver,
> > with the same naming scheme for both ways.
> >
> > As Christoph points out, it's j
[PATCH 00/25] Staging: hv: Cleanup vmbus driver code
>
> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 11:39:21AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 04:32:35PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > On the host-side, as part of configuring a guest you can specify block
.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] Staging: hv: Cleanup vmbus driver code
>
> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 03:46:23PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > What is the issue here? This is no different than what is done in other
> > Virtualization platforms. For instance, the Xen blkfr
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 03:46:23PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> What is the issue here? This is no different than what is done in other
> Virtualization platforms. For instance, the Xen blkfront driver is no
> different - if you specify the block device to be presented to the guest
> as an ide dev
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 11:39:21AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 04:32:35PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > On the host-side, as part of configuring a guest you can specify block
> > devices
> > as being under an IDE controller or under a
> > SCSI controller. Those are
ts.osdl.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] Staging: hv: Cleanup vmbus driver code
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:40:25AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Are you sure the libata core can't see this ide controller and connect
> > to it? That way you would use the scsi system if yo
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:40:25AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Are you sure the libata core can't see this ide controller and connect
> to it? That way you would use the scsi system if you do that and you
> would need a much smaller ide driver, perhaps being able to merge it
> with your scsi driver.
>
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 04:32:35PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> On the host-side, as part of configuring a guest you can specify block
> devices
> as being under an IDE controller or under a
> SCSI controller. Those are the only options you have. Devices configured under
> the IDE controller can
driver. I recently learnt
that the vmbus driver is an acpi enumerated device on the Hyper-V
platform. Added code to retrieve irq information from DSDT.
Regards,
K. Y
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux
ect: Re: [PATCH 00/25] Staging: hv: Cleanup vmbus driver code
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 04:32:35PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:h...@infradead.org]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 27
g KH; gre...@suse.de;
> > linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> > de...@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] Staging: hv: Cleanup vmbus driver code
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:47:03AM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > O
osdl.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] Staging: hv: Cleanup vmbus driver code
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:47:03AM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > On the host side, Windows emulates the standard PC hardware
> > to permit hosting of fully virtualized operating systems.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:26:13PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> Perhaps I did not properly formulate my question here. The review
> process itself may be open-ended, and that is fine - we will fix all
> legitimate
> issues/concerns in our drivers whether they are in the staging area or not.
> M
Staging: hv: Cleanup vmbus driver code
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:54:02AM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > After that, do you want another round of review of the code, or do
> > > you have more things you want to send in (like the name[64] removal?)
> >
> &
> advance of the next closing of the tree, with the hope of taking the
> vmbus driver out of staging this go around (hope springs eternal in
> the human breast ...)!
Yes, it would be nice, and I understand your the corporate pressures you
are under to get this done, and I am doing my bes
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:47:03AM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> On the host side, Windows emulates the standard PC hardware
> to permit hosting of fully virtualized operating systems.
> To enhance disk I/O performance, we support a virtual block driver.
> This block driver currently handles disks
ect: Re: [PATCH 00/25] Staging: hv: Cleanup vmbus driver code
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:54:02AM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > I would prefer that we go through the review process. What is the process
> > for
> > this review? Is there a time window for people to resp
vance of the next closing of
> the tree,
> with the hope of taking the vmbus driver out of staging this go around (hope
> springs
> eternal in the human breast ...)!
It would be useful if you'd send one driver at a time to the list as the
full source to review.
Did we ma
Staging: hv: Cleanup vmbus driver code
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:19:45AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > This patch-set addresses some of the bus/driver model cleanup that
> > Greg sugested over the last couple of days. In this patch-set we
> > deal with the followi
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:19:45AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> This patch-set addresses some of the bus/driver model cleanup that
> Greg sugested over the last couple of days. In this patch-set we
> deal with the following issues:
>
> 1) Cleanup unnecessary state in struct hv_device an
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> > de...@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] Staging: hv: Cleanup vmbus driver code
> >
> > Do you have a repository containing the current state of your patche
> > somewhere? There's been so much
[PATCH 00/25] Staging: hv: Cleanup vmbus driver code
>
> Do you have a repository containing the current state of your patche
> somewhere? There's been so much cleanup that it's hard to review these
> patches against the current mainline codebase.
Christoph,
Yesterday (
Do you have a repository containing the current state of your patche
somewhere? There's been so much cleanup that it's hard to review these
patches against the current mainline codebase.
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundati
/shutdown functions to struct hv_driver to
conform to LDM.
7) On some older Hyper-V hosts, the Linux PCI sub-sytem is not able
to allocate irq resources to the vmbus driver. I recently learnt
that the vmbus driver is an acpi enumerated device on the Hyper-V
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 02:15:47AM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:18:24PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:07:08PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Due to other external issues, my patch backlog is still not gotten
> > > > through yet,
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@suse.de]
> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2011 8:14 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Greg KH; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org
> Subject: Re: Hyper-V vmbus driver
>
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:18:24PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:07:08PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Due to other external issues, my patch backlog is still not gotten
> > through yet, sorry. Sometimes "real life" intrudes on the best of
> > plans.
> >
> > I'll get
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg KH [mailto:g...@kroah.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 11:21 AM
> To: Greg KH
> Cc: KY Srinivasan; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org
> Subject: Re: Hyper-V vmbus drive
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:07:08PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > With that patch-set, I think I have addressed all architectural issues that
> > I
> > am aware of.
> >
> > I was wondering if you would have the time to let me know what else would
> > have
>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 05:39:27PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:04:54 PDT, Greg KH said:
>
> > Thanks for the patches, but as the .39 merge window is closed, I'll be
> > holding on to these until after .39-rc1 is out before I can do anything
> > with them.
>
> Is
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@suse.de]
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 3:07 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; de...@linuxdriverproject.org;
> virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org
> Subject: Re: Hyper-V vmbus driver
>
> On
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 06:46:24PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> Greg,
>
>
>
> Recently, you applied a patch-set from me that cleaned a bunch of
> architectural
> issues in the vmbus driver.
>
> With that patch-set, I think I have addressed all architectural
Greg,
Recently, you applied a patch-set from me that cleaned a bunch of architectural
issues in the vmbus driver.
With that patch-set, I think I have addressed all architectural issues that I
am aware of.
I was wondering if you would have the time to let me know what else would have
to be
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 03:03:32PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> Make vmbus driver a pci driver. This is
> in preparation to cleaning up the root device
> management as well as the irq allocation for this
> driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan
> Signed-off-by: Ha
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:45:37 PDT, Greg KH said:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 05:39:27PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> > Is that Linus's merge window, or your window to freeze a for-linus tree?
>
> My window.
>
> Linus's merge window is for the subsystem maintainers. Everything that
> is t
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:04:54 PDT, Greg KH said:
> Thanks for the patches, but as the .39 merge window is closed, I'll be
> holding on to these until after .39-rc1 is out before I can do anything
> with them.
Is that Linus's merge window, or your window to freeze a for-linus tree?
pgpQQcJwkCpIy.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 05:39:27PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:04:54 PDT, Greg KH said:
>
> > Thanks for the patches, but as the .39 merge window is closed, I'll be
> > holding on to these until after .39-rc1 is out before I can do anything
> > with them.
>
> Is
uxdriverproject.org;
> > virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Staging: hv: Cleanup vmbus driver - Phase II
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 03:02:07PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > > This patch-set fixes the following issues in the vmbus driver
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@suse.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 6:05 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; de...@linuxdriverproject.org;
> virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Staging: hv:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 03:02:07PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> This patch-set fixes the following issues in the vmbus driver (vmbus_drv.c):
Thanks for the patches, but as the .39 merge window is closed, I'll be
holding on to these until after .39-rc1 is out before I can do anyth
Make vmbus driver a pci driver. This is
in preparation to cleaning up the root device
management as well as the irq allocation for this
driver.
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan
Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang
Signed-off-by: Mike Sterling
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kane
Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen
This patch-set fixes the following issues in the vmbus driver (vmbus_drv.c):
Make vmbus driver a platform pci device and cleanup
root device management and irq allocation
(patches 1/12 through 3/12):
1) Make vmbus driver a platform pci driver.
2) Cleanup root device management
Staging: hv: Cleanup vmbus driver
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:59:42PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > This patch-set fixes the following issues in the vmbus driver (vmbus_drv.c):
> >
> > Cleanup root device management: (patches 1/21 through 10/21)
> > 1) Get r
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:08:32PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> Make vmbus driver a platform pci driver. This is
> in preparation to cleaning up irq allocation for this
> driver.
Now wouldn't this be the "root" device that everything else hangs off
of?
> Sign
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:59:42PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> This patch-set fixes the following issues in the vmbus driver (vmbus_drv.c):
>
> Cleanup root device management: (patches 1/21 through 10/21)
> 1) Get rid of the hv_driver code from the vmbus abstraction
>
(Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD); Hank Janssen
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/21] Staging: hv: Make vmbus driver a platform pci
> driver
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:23:05PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > Greg, I have redone this patch as well as [PATCH 12/21]. Do you want
> > me
is patch-set address all of architectural issues you had
> noted earlier in the vmbus core. Please let us know what else needs to
> be done to exit staging as far as the vmbus driver is concerned. I
> want get a head start before the new week begins! Also, we have
> patches ready for all
(Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD); Hank Janssen
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/21] Staging: hv: Make vmbus driver a platform pci
> driver
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:28:27PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Greg KH
(Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD); Hank Janssen
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/21] Staging: hv: Make vmbus driver a platform pci
> driver
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:28:27PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Greg KH
uxdriverproject.org;
> > virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang; Mike Sterling; Abhishek Kane
> > (Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD); Hank Janssen
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/21] Staging: hv: Make vmbus driver a platform pci
> > driver
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 201
(Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD); Hank Janssen
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/21] Staging: hv: Make vmbus driver a platform pci
> driver
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:08:32PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > Make vmbus driver a platform pci driver. This is
> > in preparation to c
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:08:32PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> Make vmbus driver a platform pci driver. This is
> in preparation to cleaning up irq allocation for this
> driver.
The idea is nice, but the nameing is a bit confusing.
We have "platform drivers" which are
Make vmbus driver a platform pci driver. This is
in preparation to cleaning up irq allocation for this
driver.
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan
Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang
Signed-off-by: Mike Sterling
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kane
Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen
---
drivers/staging/hv
This patch-set fixes the following issues in the vmbus driver (vmbus_drv.c):
Cleanup root device management: (patches 1/21 through 10/21)
1) Get rid of the hv_driver code from the vmbus abstraction
2) Get rid of unnecessary call sequences and functions
3) Cleanup the
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:53:03PM +, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@suse.de]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 6:44 PM
> > > Convert vmbus driver interface function pointer table to constant
> > > The vmbus interface functi
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@suse.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 6:44 PM
> > Convert vmbus driver interface function pointer table to constant
> > The vmbus interface functions are assigned to a constant - vmbus_ops.
>
> You also remove a function pointer in
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 08:29:45PM +, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> From: Haiyang Zhang
>
> Convert vmbus driver interface function pointer table to constant
> The vmbus interface functions are assigned to a constant - vmbus_ops.
You also remove a function pointer in this patch, why?
From: Haiyang Zhang
Convert vmbus driver interface function pointer table to constant
The vmbus interface functions are assigned to a constant - vmbus_ops.
Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang
Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen
---
drivers/staging/hv/TODO|2 --
drivers/staging/hv
83 matches
Mail list logo
