Re: [Virtuoso-users] virtuoso Sorted TOP clause specifies more then 1000000 rows

Hi Phillip Virtuoso 22023 Error SR353: Sorted TOP clause specifies more then 100 rows to sort. Only 1 are allowed. Either decrease the offset and/or row count or use a scrollable cursor Yes, you have to use subqueries for that. Instead of writing: select ?s ?pref from

Re: [Virtuoso-users] virtuoso Sorted TOP clause specifies more then 1000000 rows

Great thanks Fred From: Frederick Giasson [mailto:f...@fgiasson.com] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 1:52 PM To: virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Virtuoso-users] virtuoso Sorted TOP clause specifies more then 100 rows Hi Phillip Virtuoso 22023 Error SR353: Sorted TOP

Re: [Virtuoso-users] vhost_define vsp_user and real user

Hi Rumi, I totally understand your point. My quesiton is about the 'vsp_user' or called 'vsp_host' used to expose the sparql endpoint. Our system security team has concern about the 'vsp_user', they are not sure what is used for, and how to configure it. Basically, they are not familiar with

Re: [Virtuoso-users] vhost_define vsp_user and real user

Hi Gang Fu, On 06-Feb-15 4:29 PM, Gang Fu wrote: Hi Rumi, I totally understand your point. My quesiton is about the 'vsp_user' or called 'vsp_host' used to expose the sparql endpoint. Our system security team has concern about the 'vsp_user', they are not sure what is used for, and how

[Virtuoso-users] virtuoso Sorted TOP clause specifies more then 1000000 rows

Virtuoso 22023 Error SR353: Sorted TOP clause specifies more then 100 rows to sort. Only 1 are allowed. Either decrease the offset and/or row count or use a scrollable cursor Is there a way to increase this? I need to download results that are more than that