Rich Smrcina wrote:
Unfortunately I don't know much about it's capabilities, but what
about
XCOM from CA?
Mike Walter wrote:
We're (pretty urgently) looking for a replacement product for one
which
just suffered hardware failure. It's unlikely that it can be
resurrected
- very old
Dennis' suggestion of Sterling's Connect:Direct seems fraught with future
problems. Didn't we just see posts that it requires VSAM, which is dead
in the water?
BSI's NJE Bridge might be interesting if you can tolerate files arriving in VM
spool.
OK, thanks for the information.
Jones, Ian H wrote:
Rich Smrcina wrote:
Unfortunately I don't know much about it's capabilities, but what
about
XCOM from CA?
Mike Walter wrote:
We're (pretty urgently) looking for a replacement product for one
which
just suffered hardware
CONNECT:Direct/VM is still marketed and supported. See Bob Heerdink's
Statement of Support in a previous thread.
If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the
sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print,
-Original Message-
From: VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 16:59
To: VMESA-L@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Best practices for z/VM file transfers?
It does work with SFS to and from SFS. See setting up the CDVMSFS
We're (pretty urgently) looking for a replacement product for one which
just suffered hardware failure. It's unlikely that it can be resurrected
- very old hardware.
Requirements:
- Batch file transfers between VM and z/OS (initiated either by a VM:Batch
job or a z/OS batch job), performed
a crocodile -- hoping it will eat him
last.. -- Winston Churchill
-Original Message-
From: VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 16:02
To: VMESA-L@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Best practices for z/VM file transfers
PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 07:02 PM
To: VMESA-L@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Best practices for z/VM file transfers?
We're (pretty urgently) looking
respond to
VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions VMESA-L@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
VMESA-L@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Best practices for z/VM file transfers?
Mike,
What was the software product that suffered a hardware failure ...
and how were they related? Do you mean something like COM-10 or 3745
this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
-Original Message-
From: VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 4:09 PM
To: VMESA-L@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [VMESA-L] Best practices for z/VM file transfers
Unfortunately I don't know much about it's capabilities, but what about
XCOM from CA?
Mike Walter wrote:
We're (pretty urgently) looking for a replacement product for one which
just suffered hardware failure. It's unlikely that it can be resurrected
- very old hardware.
Requirements:
-
11 matches
Mail list logo