Craig Berry wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2007, at 09:48AM,\
"John E. Malmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
VMS does not enforce executables having .EXE extensions.
True, but flouting the convention does seem like asking for trouble.
The test harness for VMS runs a perl binary with the n
On Wednesday, April 11, 2007, at 12:04PM, "Craig Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>On Wednesday, April 11, 2007, at 09:48AM, "John E. Malmberg" <[EMAIL
>PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Andrew Black wrote:
>>> print STDERR "*** \$thisperl=$thisperl\n" ;
>>> if ($proto->os_type eq 'VMS') {
>>>
On Wednesday, April 11, 2007, at 09:48AM, "John E. Malmberg" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Andrew Black wrote:
>> Craig A. Berry wrote:
>>> At 9:57 AM + 2/28/07, Andrew Black (delete obvious bit) wrote:
Hi
A quick progress report. I worked out roughly what is going on but
hadn
Andrew Black wrote:
Craig A. Berry wrote:
At 9:57 AM + 2/28/07, Andrew Black (delete obvious bit) wrote:
Hi
A quick progress report. I worked out roughly what is going on but
hadnt
had time to write up in more detail. I am now on holiday and don't have
access to the machine at work.
I
Craig A. Berry wrote:
At 9:57 AM + 2/28/07, Andrew Black (delete obvious bit) wrote:
Hi
A quick progress report. I worked out roughly what is going on but hadnt
had time to write up in more detail. I am now on holiday and don't have
access to the machine at work.
It is doing funny things
At 9:57 AM + 2/28/07, Andrew Black (delete obvious bit) wrote:
>Hi
>A quick progress report. I worked out roughly what is going on but hadnt
>had time to write up in more detail. I am now on holiday and don't have
>access to the machine at work.
>
>I will try to get a clearer description by ne
Hi
A quick progress report. I worked out roughly what is going on but hadnt
had time to write up in more detail. I am now on holiday and don't have
access to the machine at work.
I will try to get a clearer description by next mon.
On 2/13/07, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Black wrote:
> Can I run a subset of the make test - it takes me 40 mins to get to the
> point of failure (reminds me of batch Fortran jobs at university).
First off, use "Build test". Module::Build provides a Makefile.PL/make/make
On 2/13/07, Rafael Garcia-Suarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 13/02/07, Andrew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can I run a subset of the make test - it takes me 40 mins to get to the
> point of failure (reminds me of batch Fortran jobs at university).
on unix, the idiom for that would be :
On 2/13/07, Andrew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
At Nicholas' suggestion I have been looking into why Module::Build is
failing test on VMS. My observations are
- if you run the MB basic.t in isolation it works.
- as part of the full make test it doesn't get off the ground.
My observat
Andrew Black wrote:
> Can I run a subset of the make test - it takes me 40 mins to get to the
> point of failure (reminds me of batch Fortran jobs at university).
First off, use "Build test". Module::Build provides a Makefile.PL/make/make
test/make install for compatibility but to eliminate poss
On 13/02/07, Andrew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can I run a subset of the make test - it takes me 40 mins to get to the
point of failure (reminds me of batch Fortran jobs at university).
on unix, the idiom for that would be :
cd t ; ./perl harness
or
cd t ; ./perl TEST
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 08:48:51AM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:34:30AM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> >
> >>lib/ExtUtils/t/ManifestFAILED at test 26
> >>
> >
> >Would you be able to try out the patch adding
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 04:19:04PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 08:48:51AM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> >
> >>Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:34:30AM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
At 1:38 PM -0800 1/19/06, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>perlport says:
>
>C<-r>, C<-w>, C<-x>, and C<-o> tell whether the file is accessible,
>which may not reflect UIC-based file protections. (VMS)
>
>but I'm not sure what it means by accessible there.
If, for example, I have elevated privile
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 05:10:08PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> Execute access with out read access allows a program to be run, but no
> copies to be made or displayed. This can not currently be done with
> Perl scripts on OpenVMS. Doing so would require some changes in Perl
> and require
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 04:19:04PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Would you be able to try out the patch adding Module::Build?
Specifically I was wondering if it would fix the result of the
lib/Extutils/t/Manifest.t test.
Arrg
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 08:48:51AM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:34:30AM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
lib/ExtUtils/t/ManifestFAILED at test 26
Would you be able to try out
At 10:47 AM -0500 1/19/06, Peter Prymmer wrote:
>\diff -ruN perlpatch.orig/MANIFEST perlpatch/MANIFEST
>--- perlpatch.orig/MANIFEST 2006-01-12 19:56:56.0 +
>+++ perlpatch/MANIFEST 2006-01-14 01:15:18.547657600 +
>
>So if I set default to the directory where the MANIFEST. file h
"John E. Malmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/19/2006 08:48:51 AM:
> Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > It's at http://zipcon.net/~sthoenna/mbaddfull123.patch
> Is this something to fix this test, or does it add new functionality?
>
> I have no experience using the patch utility, so I prob
20 matches
Mail list logo
