On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 04:19:04PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote: > Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 08:48:51AM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote: > > > >>Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >> > >>>On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:34:30AM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>lib/ExtUtils/t/Manifest........................FAILED at test 26 > >>>> > >>> > >>>Would you be able to try out the patch adding Module::Build? > >>> > >> > >>Is this something to fix this test, or does it add new functionality? > > > >It fixes something broken only in the newest version of Pod::Text > >that bites Module::Build. There's supposed to be a new version > >of Pod::Text with it fixed any day now. > > Specifically I was wondering if it would fix the result of the > lib/Extutils/t/Manifest.t test.
Arrg. I'm sorry, I only just noticed I hijacked an existing thread. I must have been asleep at the keyboard. No, this has nothing to do with the Manifest.t failure, sorry. Looking at the failing test, does VMS even have a concept of an executable bit? perlport says: C<-r>, C<-w>, C<-x>, and C<-o> tell whether the file is accessible, which may not reflect UIC-based file protections. (VMS) but I'm not sure what it means by accessible there.
