Re: error building perl 5.8.4

2005-02-18 Thread Craig A. Berry
That confirms that the version of MMK you are using has the same problem as 3.9-9. Please verify that 3.9-10 is really what you've got with $ mmk/ident If 3.9-10 is indeed what you've got, then we need to give Matt Madison another heads up as this was the bug that version was supposed to fix. I

Re: Changing osname or ^O from VMS.C at startup?

2005-02-18 Thread John E. Malmberg
Craig A. Berry wrote: At 12:32 AM -0500 2/16/05, John E. Malmberg wrote: $ search/exact *.c "OSNAME" ** D0:[CRAIG.PERL-5_8]perl.c;1 PL_osname = savepv(OSNAME); Some how I must have missed that one. The help of this mailing list has been of great assistance, thes

Re: error building perl 5.8.4

2005-02-18 Thread John W. Parker
Here are the results: @test_implicit_rule.com %MMK-I-OPENDESC, reading description file HOME$SYSGRP:[JWPARKER.PERL]IMPLICIT_RU LE.MMS;1 %MMK-I-CHECKUPD, checking need to update target TESTME.BAZ %MMK-I-TRGLKUF, lookup for target TESTME.BAZ failed - update required -RMS-E-FNF, file not found %MMK-I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] ExtUtils::MakeMaker 6.25_08

2005-02-18 Thread PPrymmer
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/08/2005 09:31:48 AM: > Its time for another MakeMaker alpha! This one is mostly VMS fixes though > I also discovered a conflict with Module::Install and undid an accidental > change that broken Archive::Zip. As far as I know all outstanding issue

Re: Error testing Pathtools 3.04 * Perl 5.8.6

2005-02-18 Thread Dave Greenwood
Craig Berry wrote: > At 2:27 PM -0500 2/18/05, Dave Greenwood wrote: > >I've installed Perl 5.8.6 (using VMS 7.3-1 and MMK 3.9-9. I then downloaded > >PathTools 3.04 and unpacked that into > >PERL_ROOT:[LIB.SITE_PERL.PATHTOOLS-3_04...]. > > Eek. You should never directly put anything under > pe

Re: Error testing Pathtools 3.04 * Perl 5.8.6

2005-02-18 Thread Craig A. Berry
At 2:27 PM -0500 2/18/05, Dave Greenwood wrote: >I've installed Perl 5.8.6 (using VMS 7.3-1 and MMK 3.9-9. I then downloaded >PathTools 3.04 and unpacked that into >PERL_ROOT:[LIB.SITE_PERL.PATHTOOLS-3_04...]. Eek. You should never directly put anything under perl_root:[00...]. Only Perl'

error building perl 5.8.4

2005-02-18 Thread John W. Parker
- OpenVMS 7.3-2 - DECC 6.5 - MMK V3.9-10 - ODS 2 disk - Multinet 4.4 fully patched - No previous version of perl. - Fresh install of OpenVMS. Having a problem building perl. I see the following error as it exits: CC/DECC /Include=[]/Standard=Relaxed_ANSI/Prefix=All/Obj=.obj /NOANSI_ALIAS/floa

Error testing Pathtools 3.04 * Perl 5.8.6

2005-02-18 Thread Dave Greenwood
I've installed Perl 5.8.6 (using VMS 7.3-1 and MMK 3.9-9. I then downloaded PathTools 3.04 and unpacked that into PERL_ROOT:[LIB.SITE_PERL.PATHTOOLS-3_04...]. It appears to build ok but fails when I try to test it. In particular, it appears to be looking for cwd.pm in [-.lib] when it's actually

new place to get VMS Perl binaries

2005-02-18 Thread Craig A. Berry
I'm not sure whom we have to thank for putting this together, but the new HP Freeware CD v7.0 has several recent Perl kits, both source and binaries: http://h71000.www7.hp.com/freeware/freeware70/perl/ You'll see my easy-to-build source kit of Perl 5.8.4 (perlbuild584.zip) which includes a number o

adding extensions to Perl (was Re: failed tests after 5.8.6 build)

2005-02-18 Thread Craig A. Berry
At 10:51 AM -0500 2/18/05, Dave Greenwood wrote: >I plan to add several additional CPAN modules. Is there an advantage to >building them into perl as opposed to adding or upgrading them later? I'm >thinking of the question in @CONFIGURE about which modules to build into >perl. If there is an adv

Re: failed tests after 5.8.6 build

2005-02-18 Thread Dave Greenwood
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:09:45 -0600 From: "Craig A. Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: failed tests after 5.8.6 build In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Dave Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: vmsperl@perl.org > At 4:25 PM -0500 2/17/05, Dave Greenwood wrote: > >VMS 7.3-1 axp, MMK V3.9-9,