.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wall, John
Sent: 24 September 2004 00:19
To: Ward, Stuart; VNC List; 'Chris Goodwin'
Subject: RE: local host vs local address
Hi Stuart,
My experiences with VNC Server re binding are mainly
Weatherall[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 24 September 2004 5:49 PM
To: 'Wall, John'; 'Ward, Stuart'; 'VNC List'; 'Chris Goodwin'
Subject: RE: local host vs local address
John at al,
The notion of VNC binding to a particular _interface_ is bogus. When
accepting incoming
This may be related to SP2 issue that a recent fix has been put out for by
MS.
Stu
-Original Message-
From: Chris Goodwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 1:01 PM
To: VNC List
Subject: local host vs local address
I have the same issue as the gentleman below
]
To: VNC List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: local host vs local address
This may be related to SP2 issue that a recent fix has been put out for by
MS.
Stu
-Original Message-
From: Chris Goodwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
.
John
--
From: Chris Goodwin[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply To: Chris Goodwin
Sent: Friday, 24 September 2004 1:18 AM
To: Ward, Stuart; VNC List
Subject: Re: local host vs local address
Thanks, Stuart, this particular station is still @ SP1, fully patched
Subject: RE: local host vs local address
This may be related to SP2 issue that a recent fix has been put out for by
MS.
Stu
-Original Message-
From: Chris Goodwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 1:01 PM
To: VNC List
Subject: local host vs local
