Peter,
I am selling to small and medium sized business customer. We also have
residential side for an ISP. Our average seat selling price today is
between $25 to $35 per seat, so no I am not trying to sell on low price.
However, I personally hate selling to the customer when I know what else is
You didn't get my whole point.
Customers want the same cheaper -- because that is how we trained them
to think.
That is how we "sell" in telecom. We take orders while driving the price
to zero because (A) we don't value sales and marketing as a sector of
the economy; and (B) this has
Enswitch is licenced based on concurrent call path (in a commonsensical,
humane usage). At a seat-to-call contention ratio of 8:1 to 10:1 commonly found
in the business PBX world, it's hard to imagine how you could not make money,
even if you charged the lowest of glorified POTS replacement
Those are the 4.
Hint: If you are going to buy BSFT, get it via Taqua: cliff.mai...@taqua.com
On 11/2/2015 9:00 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
So far based on recommendations I see Broadsoft, Metaswitch,
NetSapiens, and Enswitch by Integrics as options. I am going to throw
out 2600hz as a
Let me rephrase. After reading so much on why Freeswitch was developed in
the first place, I consider Freeswitch to be a more powerful and better
media engine than what Asterisk is. So its not that I object to opensource
in general, I just think moving forward that if building a communications
You said it all with these very words.
On 11/2/2015 10:34 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
However, I personally hate selling to the customer when I know what
else is out there today. I hate explaining time and time again that we
have to charge for every auto attendant, voicemail box, etc.
We have
On 11/02/2015 10:18 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
Thanks for the wonderful information about Asterisk. I was unaware of
this, so all good points!
:-) The classic "why we dumped Asterisk to start Freeswitch" narrative
was current in the mid-late 2000s, but not anymore.
What are your throughs on
On 11/02/2015 10:19 AM, Peter Rad. wrote:
To support software you have to have revenue. Hence, per seat licensing
or maintenance fees.
BSFT may be expensive but it has proven to scale - over 1M trunks from
XO and WIND and 10K seats added per month by an MSO. You pay for that.
That said. You
Heya Bill
Perhaps you've been inundated with better off-list suggestions, but having not
seen any on-list traffic I thought I'd reply with a recommendation
Have a look at 2talk.com. We use their New Zealand service (2talk.co.nz) and
are pretty happy with it. They have a web interface for
Le 2015-11-03 00:04, Colton Conor a écrit :
> Let me rephrase. After reading so much on why Freeswitch was developed
> in the first place, I consider Freeswitch to be a more powerful and
> better media engine than what Asterisk is. So its not that I object to
> opensource in general, I just think
On 11/02/2015 09:00 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
I don't like the tough of Asterisk being the core of the product.
I'm sorry, but that's just ignorant. Do you object to Broadworks running
on Linux and not AIX, too?
I mean, I suppose I could understand your reluctance at using a
glorified
Ah, a Freeswitch religionist (don't worry, I prefer Freeswitch myself).
Some things you should probably be aware of:
- Architectural shifts in >= Asterisk 10 that have closed performance gaps with
Freeswitch.
- Asterisk's adoption of the PJSIP SIP stack & PJMEDIA.
- New ARI (RESTful) API.
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
