Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

ember 1, 2015 at 9:56 AM > To: Colton Conor <colton.co...@gmail.com> > Cc: "voiceops@voiceops.org" <voiceops@voiceops.org> > Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor > > Colton, > > The configuration steps are quite simple and outlined here: > >

Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

How specifically does this work with Poylcom VVX phones that have the VQMon license? I know the VVX 500 and VXX 600 come with the license by default, but the lower part of the line you have to purchase the VQMON license which we have that is like an additional $2 per phone one time cost. I guess

Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

Lorenzo, What about RTCP-XR with Homer? Or is RTCP-XR a paid for feature only working with PCAPture? Above you mentioned RTCP-XT, but I assume you mean to type RTCP-XR as I have not heard of RTCP-XT. On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Lorenzo Mangani wrote: >

Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

I believe you are correct that Homer only does SIP, where VoIPMonitor does both. This bring me back to the question of Polycom Phones with VQMON that use thee standard *RTCP-XR (IETF RFC 3611) format and can publish metrics using the SIP PUBLISH method. These are RTP stats for the most part

Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

On 20/11/15 14:22, Colton Conor wrote: > I believe you are correct that Homer only does SIP, where VoIPMonitor > does both. The latest version of homer capture agent can track rtcp: https://github.com/sipcapture/captagent Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

+1. On all points. Thanks, Shripal > On Nov 19, 2015, at 11:03 PM, jay binks wrote: > > Ive used Voipmonitor for a few years now, it started out OK, but now.. its > AWESOME. > > parts are open source ( mainly the sniffer / analyser ). > the commercial part is the web

Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

I have had experience with Empirix, Palladian and VoIPMonitor. Both Empirix and Palladian are EXPENSIVE and very hard to Engineer correctly to capture all the messaging. An under-engineered system will be VERY annoying and a HUGE waste of money. VoIPMonitor has been extremely valuable, very

Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

Jumping on the VoIPmonitor bandwagon here; they've been more responsive than the average vendor to new feature requests. A memorable interaction went something like this: Voxox: "We'd like voipmon to do X." (e.g. process RTCP-XR and SIP PUBLISH reports from Polycom, or analyze a proprietary

Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

, 2015 1:33 PM To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor Jumping on the VoIPmonitor bandwagon here; they've been more responsive than the average vendor to new feature requests. A memorable interaction went something like this: Voxox: "We'd like voipmon to do X.&

Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

le front end? > > > --- > Brian J Murray > > -Original Message- > From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Calvin > Ellison > Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 1:33 PM > To: voiceops@voiceops.org > Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMon

Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

To: Calvin Ellison <calvin.elli...@voxox.com>; voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor Is anyone clustering VoIPMonitor? Geographically diverse networks with probes reporting up to a single front end? --- Brian J Murray -Original M

Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

Anyone have a sales contact at voipmonitor they can share or should I just go through their webpage? Feel free to reply on or off-list. Thanks, Pete On Nov 20, 2015, at 16:33, Gavin Henry wrote: On 20 Nov 2015 21:15, "Calvin Ellison" wrote:

Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

Just email i...@voipmonitor.org. Martin will respond quickly. Geoff Mina President & CIO Connect First, Inc. 720.335.5924 Website | LinkedIn | Email On Nov 20,

Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

Geoffrey, What issues did you face with Palladion. Curious. Thanks, Brian On 11/19/15, 9:44 PM, "VoiceOps on behalf of Geoffrey Mina" wrote: >We use VoipMonitor. It's the best that I have used. Definitely better in

Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

Understood. We’ve been using a VAR for Palladion and now Oracle. So we never actually have to deal with Oracle. I’m going to test VoipMonitor early next year. --- Brian J Murray Director, Network Engineering On 11/19/15, 10:24 PM, "Geoffrey Mina"

Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

Ive used Voipmonitor for a few years now, it started out OK, but now.. its AWESOME. parts are open source ( mainly the sniffer / analyser ). the commercial part is the web UI. I cant praise it highly enough, and the price is excellent. Martin is also highly contactable and open to suggestion /

Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

Pcapture, which is the commercial version of Homer, is also an excellent option. Cheers, Brad On Nov 19, 2015 5:06 PM, "Colton Conor" wrote: > What are the differences between these two applications? I know homer is > free and opensource, and VoIPMonitor is a paid