Not us.
Is this topic interesting enough to everyone to try and formalize and
develop? (i.e. take it off the email list and do something more)? Maybe
meet up at SIPNOC? (though that's 1/2 year away). We'd be happy to host
something (say, a two-day meeting) here sooner, if there's interest.
On
This is a slight topic change, but at SIPNOC for the last few years, FCC and
FCC-connected people have come and talked about the plans for transitioning. My
general sense is that the they're considering adding something like an IP
address to the NPAC data structure.
There's a new IETF working
I don't mean to be a Negative Nancy, but I am concerned that some of may
not realise how many times this conversation has played out before, in
various permutations. The PSTN is dead, long live the PSTN, etc.
The enthusiastic proclamation of a forum/vehicle/working
Sigh, yes I recall sitting at an event hosted by Jeff Pulver in NYC, back in
2009. "The future is here!" cried one and all, just not yet.
OTOH, at least the very backward looking have largely stopped the plaintive
bleating about "spectral efficiency" and bandwidth constraints.
I for one
On 12/09/2015 01:16 PM, mgra...@mstvp.com wrote:
There was a time where certain parties from a large wireless carrier
were sounding the alarm about spectral waste, even as their very own
marketing teams were extolling the virtues of watching television on
your mobile phone. This sort of talking
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Future of the
Traditional PSTN vs VOIP and VoLTE
From: "Alex Balashov"
Date: 12/9/15 12:10 pm
To: mgra...@mstvp.com, voiceops@voiceops.org
Cc: "Randy Resnick"
On 12/09/2015 01:07 PM,
Argh. I've come up with three different ideas in this email, and deleted
them all.
1. Carriers do not want to disclose which DIDs they service. A
company's customers might not want an easy way for callers to find out
that the number is associated with that business, or that the
I'd add a #7 to "what I believe we agree upon":
7. The current PSTN prevents and the new world order offers, or at least
allows for, high def and video codecs, and other cool new things yet to be
imagined.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Peter Beckman wrote:
> Argh. I've
Peter -
This instantly provides the ability to remove the cost of termination and
> origination, and while adding to the number of relationships that are
> required in order to reach all phone numbers, can move us toward
> decentralization of the telephony world.
>
> Beckman
>
> PS Man that last