Re: [VoiceOps] Anyone having trouble with Onvoy TN's for Origination?
We now have some Vitelity DIDs failing, and this is on their site: Monday April 18th 2016, 1:56pm MDT -We have worked with our partner to resolve the intermittent inbound call completion. Calls are now completing correctly. If you are still experiencing any issues please open a trouble ticket with call examples. - - - - We are still experiencing some issues with CNAM not showing on inbound calls. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Reinventing Richwrote: > Or is it just vitelity again >.< > > -- > Cheers, > Rich Breton > > Give a man a program, you will frustrate him for a day;Teach him how to > program, you will frustrate him for a lifetime. > > ___ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps@voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > > ___ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Re: [VoiceOps] Virtualized SBC
One of the features of the way marketing has worked for the last hundred years is that every once in a while somebody will call BS when the needle gets too high with folks parroting vendor whitepapers and collateral. They are largely ignored, have little no material impact on the planet or the world, and life goes on--they're no match for billion-dollar snowjob budgets. And yet it would be fair to say that piercing the fog is a periodically necessary activity that provides a certain strategic balance, even if a lopsided ones. I was certainly around for the "Ha? Linux? It is not a serious OS for the enterprise." discourse back in the day. FOSS acquires market share somehow. By and large, it's by sticking to the fundamentals. -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30309 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ Sent from my BlackBerry. Original Message From: James Milko Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 11:32 To: Ryan Finnesey Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Virtualized SBC ___ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Re: [VoiceOps] Anyone having trouble with Onvoy TN's for Origination?
Thanks bud. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Carlos Alvarezwrote: > We have a few thousand of them and no reports of trouble. I'm looking > right now at a different issue so I'm watching a lot of Onvoy calls coming > in without anything looking wrong. > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Reinventing Rich < > reinventingr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Or is it just vitelity again >.< >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Rich Breton >> >> Give a man a program, you will frustrate him for a day;Teach him how to >> program, you will frustrate him for a lifetime. >> >> ___ >> VoiceOps mailing list >> VoiceOps@voiceops.org >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >> >> > > ___ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps@voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > > -- Cheers, Rich Breton Give a man a program, you will frustrate him for a day;Teach him how to program, you will frustrate him for a lifetime. ___ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Re: [VoiceOps] Anyone having trouble with Onvoy TN's for Origination?
We have a few thousand of them and no reports of trouble. I'm looking right now at a different issue so I'm watching a lot of Onvoy calls coming in without anything looking wrong. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Reinventing Richwrote: > Or is it just vitelity again >.< > > -- > Cheers, > Rich Breton > > Give a man a program, you will frustrate him for a day;Teach him how to > program, you will frustrate him for a lifetime. > > ___ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps@voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > > ___ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
[VoiceOps] Anyone having trouble with Onvoy TN's for Origination?
Or is it just vitelity again >.< -- Cheers, Rich Breton Give a man a program, you will frustrate him for a day;Teach him how to program, you will frustrate him for a lifetime. ___ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Re: [VoiceOps] media bypass question
If the customer truly has an SBC I don’t see why you couldn’t put the Carrier information in the SDP going out to the customer. Same thing going back, Customer SDP on 200 OK back to the carrier. Most customers in Hosted PBX don’t have an SBC however, they have a dumb firewall. In the case of a dumb firewall (or worse a broken SIP ALG) you are risking one way audio problems if the Carrier SBC doesn’t handle RTP latching. — Matthew Crocker President - Crocker Communications, Inc. Managing Partner - Crocker Telecommunications, LLC E: matt...@corp.crocker.com E: matt...@crocker.com > On Apr 18, 2016, at 9:39 AM, Kumudu Suriyaarachchi> wrote: > > Hello, > > > Is there a mechanism to achieve media bypass from the customer premise SBC > to peering/carrier SBC where in a typical NAT traversal hosted PBX > deployment? > > I am talking about multi-vendor SBCs on the access and the peering sides. > > > Thanks, > > Kumudu > > > ___ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps@voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops ___ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
[VoiceOps] media bypass question
Hello, Is there a mechanism to achieve media bypass from the customer premise SBC to peering/carrier SBC where in a typical NAT traversal hosted PBX deployment? I am talking about multi-vendor SBCs on the access and the peering sides. Thanks, Kumudu ___ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops