Re: [VoiceOps] LRN and valid values

2021-05-26 Thread Paul Timmins
> I don't know. I cannot seem to get my carrier to identify a situation where > I would want to terminate a call and the LRN I would get back would be > 732040 or similar. It never will. The code is unrouteable. I'm sure it exists in the LERG somewhere for some sort of pANI or billing

Re: [VoiceOps] LRN and valid values

2021-05-26 Thread Peter Beckman
On Wed, 26 May 2021, Alex Balashov wrote: Where does this conflict emerge in practice? Do customers call numbers in this exchange? Do you get billed for calls (less any LRN dip fees) to this exchange even though none of your wholesale termination vendors can route it? I don't know. I cannot

Re: [VoiceOps] LRN and valid values

2021-05-26 Thread Jamie Montgomery
There is an entry for 732040A.. OCN refers back to Verizon of Jew Jersey. The Rate Center is all X's, so it's a special code of some kind.. cant be assinged to an originating number, I dont believe. Jamie M. From: VoiceOps on behalf of

[VoiceOps] Caveat to the 2023 STIR/SHAKEN extension for small companies

2021-05-26 Thread Mary Lou Carey
One more thing.I also found out that there's a caveat to the June 30, 2023 extension for small carriers. Although the FCC granted smaller carriers an extension to implement STIR/SHAKEN, that does not exempt your company from filing your Robocall Mitigation Plan by June 30th, 2021. So

Re: [VoiceOps] Robocall mitigation SCAM!

2021-05-26 Thread Mary Lou Carey
All I know is that I was told it happened to several legitimate carriers that were small companies. Just be careful is all I'm saying because its not worth losing your business over. MARY LOU CAREY BackUP Telecom Consulting Office: 615-791-9969 Cell: 615-796- On 2021-05-26 03:12 PM,

Re: [VoiceOps] Robocall mitigation SCAM!

2021-05-26 Thread Mary Lou Carey
I understand it might provide helpful information, but from the sound of it these carriers were punished for keeping the traffic up as they were instructed to do. No one at the ITG or large carrier took responsibility for advising the carrier to keep the traffic up so either the right hand

Re: [VoiceOps] Robocall mitigation SCAM!

2021-05-26 Thread Alex Balashov
On 5/26/21 4:12 PM, Matthew Yaklin wrote: the ones where you google search the US street address on their website using maps and find out it is just a run down apartment building? Hey! What if your business is based in a run-down apartment building?  -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste

Re: [VoiceOps] Robocall mitigation SCAM!

2021-05-26 Thread Matthew Yaklin
Mary Lou, Are you referring to the super sketchy voip providers who list a US address but in reality are based overseas? Like the ones where you google search the US street address on their website using maps and find out it is just a run down apartment building? Or are you talking about more

Re: [VoiceOps] Robocall mitigation SCAM!

2021-05-26 Thread Mark Lindsey
Good tips, Mary Lou! Do you think there's potentially any good intentions behind the advice to leave the traffic up? In the cybersecurity space, authorities will say that if your network has been compromised, you shouldn't immediately shutdown the hacked systems. For example, just this past

[VoiceOps] Robocall mitigation SCAM!

2021-05-26 Thread Mary Lou Carey
I just heard through the grapevine that several companies have been shut down and/or threatened with the confiscation of their equipment for passing Robocall traffic. The companies that this happened to all claimed someone contacted them and told them to keep the TN/traffic up so they could