Re: [VoiceOps] 8YY Traffic

How would you go about determining if a toll free number is intralata or not? From: VoiceOps on behalf of Mary Lou Carey Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 5:31 PM To: Mike Hammett Cc: voiceops Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] 8YY Traffic You should be able to route 8YY

Re: [VoiceOps] 8YY Traffic

You should be able to route 8YY traffic over both but only IntraLATA 8YY traffic over the Local IntraLATA trunk group. MARY LOU CAREY BackUP Telecom Consulting Office: 615-791-9969 Cell: 615-796- On 2021-07-01 10:20 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: Is there any reason I can't throw all 8YY traffic

Re: [VoiceOps] question about stir/shaken - iat and DATE header

Date header has been part of RFC-3261 SIP for 19 years now, but was not used all that much. IAT and Date are both part of the specs and more recent RFC's that define stir-shaken.   So the seldom-used but long time defined Date: header is now

Re: [VoiceOps] question about stir/shaken - iat and DATE header

I've heard that TNSi also counts on the date header being present. So far we don't see a lot of people passing tokens with the date header. From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Yaklin Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2021 12:25 PM To: voiceops@voiceops.org

[VoiceOps] question about stir/shaken - iat and DATE header

All, Pretty simple question here. When you do a verify request are you filling in the iat with your sbc's current date/time or using the DATE information from the invite? With Neustar the iat is currently optional. IQNT is basically removing the DATE header in a test we are doing by sending

Re: [VoiceOps] TMobile Sending Calls to LRN not Called Number

ugh, in the CalledPartyNumber field, not CallingParty. Have not had enough caffeine today. Might not be enough caffeine on the planet for today. On 7/1/21 12:15 PM, Paul Timmins via VoiceOps wrote: STIR/SHAKEN isn't implemented at all in TDM world. I've had problems on and off for years where

Re: [VoiceOps] TMobile Sending Calls to LRN not Called Number

STIR/SHAKEN isn't implemented at all in TDM world. I've had problems on and off for years where a carrier will take SS7 traffic, send it over some janky arrangement that strips the GenericAddress parameter (where your actual destination number is hidden in the IAM - when you dip in SS7 you

Re: [VoiceOps] TMobile Sending Calls to LRN not Called Number

Agreed. From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2021 10:43 AM To: VoiceOps Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] TMobile Sending Calls to LRN not Called Number I periodically have to explain to vendors of various things, including quite

Re: [VoiceOps] TMobile Sending Calls to LRN not Called Number

Those are exactly my thoughts but legitimate customers are being caught up in it. MARK TIMM Switch Engineer 515-830-0478 -Original Message- From: Mary Lou Carey Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 10:42 AM To: Mark Timm Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] TMobile Sending Calls

Re: [VoiceOps] TMobile Sending Calls to LRN not Called Number

I periodically have to explain to vendors of various things, including quite reputable vendors, that you can’t route based on the To header in any way, and the value in it matters for nothing, and it doesn’t need to align with the RURI, and in many cases won’t and shouldn’t. For some reason,

Re: [VoiceOps] TMobile Sending Calls to LRN not Called Number

I'm not an expert in how STIR/SHAKEN is implemented in the TDM world, but I've never heard of this happening until recently. I've heard anything sent over the SS7 network has issues with the token being dropped. Maybe the problem is bigger than just the token being dropped.maybe what they

Re: [VoiceOps] TMobile Sending Calls to LRN not Called Number

It’s not just T-Mobile, it’s Verizon, US Cell and Lumen originations. I believe it is traffic that Inteliquent back hauls. Mark Timm Switch Engineer Aureon 7760 Office Plaza Drive South West Des Moines , IA 50266 mark.t...@aureon.com 515-830-0478 www.Aureon.com This message contains

Re: [VoiceOps] TMobile Sending Calls to LRN not Called Number

We’ve seen this on Ribbon SBCs running their 8.2.x code. If a forwarded call comes in (where the number on the RURI is not the same as the To) when the PSX does an LNP dip it will rewrite the RURI to the LRN. Which of course causes the call to fail. I have no idea if this is the same issue

[VoiceOps] 8YY Traffic

Is there any reason I can't throw all 8YY traffic at my IXC tandem? In looking in my Metaswitch config, it appears that only 8YY traffic destined for my LATA (which doesn't really make any sense) goes to the tandem. Everything else goes out to a domestic termination provider. - Mike

[VoiceOps] TMobile Sending Calls to LRN not Called Number

Anyone else seeing calls from TMobile coming in with the LRN as the called number? The ISUP doesn't show the actual called number so we can't route the calls. -Matthew ___ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org