The caller-ID signaling between rings 1 and 2 should include time. If they
answer too quickly, no name, number, or time. Remember the old AT caller-id
display boxes? You never had to set the time on those as it was signaled with
the call.
In this case, your ATA needs to send time with
Call-forward busy or is that simplifying it too much?
From: VoiceOps On Behalf Of Deborah McDuffie
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 11:30 AM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: [VoiceOps] Call Overflow Handling
Good morning,
We've got a request from one of our SIP trunk customers, asking us to
What are you all using for your B/OSS software? Ours is home grown and we're
looking to replace. We've looked at Sonar and it has potential but is more
ISP/WISP oriented. What are other's experiences in 3rd party solutions?
Thanks,
Lee Riemer
VP Network Operations
[Bestline Communications
Google fu:
https://nelenkov.blogspot.com/2014/07/secure-voice-communication-on-android.html
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Vince
Newbaker
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 6:15 AM
To: Leandro Dardini
Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] SIP mobile
Mark,
Did you elect to go with the global infrastructure, or are you running it in
their private or public cloud?
Thanks,
Lee
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Mark Diaz
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:03 AM
To: Shripal Daphtary
Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org
How big is the packet with that header? If you’re not running TCP then it
could have been truncated and ignored by the endpoint.
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of David Wessell
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 3:25 PM
To: Carlos Alvarez
Cc: VoiceOps
If you need more horsepower, for about $100 extra, you can load linux on a
Netgate appliance. Something like an SG-1000
https://www.netgate.com/products/sg-1000.html
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Shripal
Daphtary
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 8:01 AM
To:
You’ll need to be aware of what level of traffic you’re trying to mirror into
the Pi. The onboard NIC is riding the USB bus which you’ll then share with the
external USB NIC. If the Pi is receiving too much data, it’ll drop packets.
This would appear as an RTP problem even if there isn’t one
If you’ve deployed hard phones for these users, try configuring the phones to
use your own DNS servers.
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Carlos
Alvarez
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2016 11:49 AM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: [VoiceOps] Cox cable "outages" and
>From outages:
From: Outages [mailto:outages-boun...@outages.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Rittgarn
via Outages
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 1:23 PM
To: 'outa...@outages.org'
Subject: Re: [outages] Level3 Chicago?
Coming from Atlanta to my facility in Chicago
1<1 ms<1 ms<1 ms
Your cell number should be sacred. Call forward through your platform and do
call screening there.
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Jared Smith
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 9:25 AM
To: Peter Beckman
Cc: VoiceOps
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Sophisticated
Treat it as a fax/modem line. It is in fact two machines communicating with
each other…
Disable echo cancellation
Disable alc
Disable plc
Fix the jitter buffer at a max of 200ms
Turn down the gain (reduces echo)
Disable modem detection and t38
Disable call-waiting
From: VoiceOps
What about a recursive BIND server which will return results from its hosts
file but forward other queries to your internal DNS servers? The hosts file
would contain your overrides.
-Original Message-
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Ray Van
Dolson
I presume you’ll need to use a SIP ATA device with FXO ports and set it up as a
SIP trunk in Lync.
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Wayne Roberts
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 6:22 AM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: [VoiceOps] lync and pots lines
Hi folks,
Yes and Oakland. Seen as high at 18.5% packet loss. Open a ticket if you
haven’t already.
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of David Wessell
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:38 PM
To: VoiceOps (voiceops@voiceops.org)
Subject: [VoiceOps] Windstream
Anyone else
Are you using the pre-Windstream PAETEC origination?
From: David Wessell [mailto:da...@ringfree.biz]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 1:03 PM
To: Lee Riemer
Cc: VoiceOps (voiceops@voiceops.org)
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Windstream
L3 fiber cut last week causing intermittent audio issues. Whatever
and efficiency of our
network, which we hope will correct the issue, and we will continue to monitor
to ensure stability.
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Lee Riemer
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 1:49 PM
To: VoiceOps (voiceops@voiceops.org)
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps
Which direction is the one-way audio, who can’t hear? Is it behind a firewall
or ALG?
What stats do you see when you do a “show voice quality-stats” and look at a
bad call?
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of David Wessell
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 3:07 PM
Turning off MAC address learning on a switch will turn it into a hub without
the interface collisions.
-Original Message-
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Carlos
Alvarez
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 3:55 PM
To: VoiceOps (voiceops@voiceops.org)
We've had complaints from customers this morning where they get multiple calls
around the same time with no audio from the same number. After comparing the
call records for different customers, they all lead to Pacwest. Anyone seeing
similar issues? It's like the calls are being retried from
Nice. Learn something new every day.
-Original Message-
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Alex
Balashov
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 1:33 PM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Timing slips on subrate DS1s on CT3
Someone e-mailed me
21 matches
Mail list logo
