Re: [VoiceOps] Toll Free Caller ID

2020-05-14 Thread Calvin Ellison 
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:02 AM Glen Gerhard  wrote:

> I agree with Paul. From what I know the 8YY ANIs are handled like any
> other ANI.
>

Are underlying carriers treating these as indeterminate, or given their own
jurisdiction and rates?
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Re: [VoiceOps] Toll Free Caller ID

2020-05-14 Thread Glen Gerhard 

  
  
I agree with Paul. From what I know the 8YY ANIs are
  handled like any other ANI.
  
  ~Glen

On 5/14/2020 9:08, Paul Timmins wrote:


  
  

  What's the news on using TFN as a caller ID?
  
People have been doing it for years

  
  Does this require a local charge number in P-Charge-Info
or P_Asserted_Identity or elsewhere?
  
It does if you want calling other toll-free numbers or
  911 to work, otherwise it doesn't really matter.

  
  Has the FCC or anyone else approved TFN as ANI?
  
Does anyone need to?

  
  Is TF ANI supported for STIR/SHAKEN?
  
If you have the certs, you can attest to whatever you
  want. It's designed to create accountability for
  originating carriers, not police numbering formats.

  

  
  
  
  On 5/14/20 11:56 AM, Oren Yehezkely
wrote:
  
  

Calvin,
  
  
  I wonder if you got any insight to this question?
  
  
  Regards,
  Oren
  



  On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 5:01
PM Calvin Ellison 
wrote:
  
  

  It looks like Somos is pushing TFN CNAM, press
release below from Mar 30, 2020. I've always
understood TF ANI to be invalid. 
  
  
  
  What's the news on using TFN as a caller ID?
  Does this require a local charge number in
P-Charge-Info or P_Asserted_Identity or elsewhere?
  Has the FCC or anyone else approved TFN as ANI?
  Is TF ANI supported for STIR/SHAKEN?


https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/toll-free-caller-id-information-helps-hhs-get-critical-phone-calls-answered-301031714.html  
  

  

  

  

  

  
  
  
  
  Regards,



  Calvin
  Ellison
Senior Voice Operations
Engineer
calvin.elli...@voxox.com
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
  



___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

  
  
  
  
  
  ___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops



-- 
Glen Gerhard
g...@cognexus.net
858.324.4536

Cognexus, LLC
7891 Avenida Kirjah
San Diego, CA 92037

  

___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Re: [VoiceOps] Toll Free Caller ID

2020-05-14 Thread Paul Timmins 

1. What's the news on using TFN as a caller ID?
1. People have been doing it for years
2. Does this require a local charge number in P-Charge-Info or
   P_Asserted_Identity or elsewhere?
1. It does if you want calling other toll-free numbers or 911 to
   work, otherwise it doesn't really matter.
3. Has the FCC or anyone else approved TFN as ANI?
1. Does anyone need to?
4. Is TF ANI supported for STIR/SHAKEN?
1. If you have the certs, you can attest to whatever you want. It's
   designed to create accountability for originating carriers, not
   police numbering formats.


On 5/14/20 11:56 AM, Oren Yehezkely wrote:

Calvin,

I wonder if you got any insight to this question?

Regards,
Oren

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 5:01 PM Calvin Ellison 
mailto:calvin.elli...@voxox.com>> wrote:


It looks like Somos is pushing TFN CNAM, press release below from
Mar 30, 2020. I've always understood TF ANI to be invalid.

What's the news on using TFN as a caller ID?
Does this require a local charge number in P-Charge-Info or
P_Asserted_Identity or elsewhere?
Has the FCC or anyone else approved TFN as ANI?
Is TF ANI supported for STIR/SHAKEN?


https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/toll-free-caller-id-information-helps-hhs-get-critical-phone-calls-answered-301031714.html



Regards,

*Calvin Ellison*
Senior Voice Operations Engineer
calvin.elli...@voxox.com 

___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops



___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Re: [VoiceOps] Toll Free Caller ID

2020-05-14 Thread Oren Yehezkely 
Calvin,

I wonder if you got any insight to this question?

Regards,
Oren

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 5:01 PM Calvin Ellison 
wrote:

> It looks like Somos is pushing TFN CNAM, press release below from Mar 30,
> 2020. I've always understood TF ANI to be invalid.
>
> What's the news on using TFN as a caller ID?
> Does this require a local charge number in P-Charge-Info or
> P_Asserted_Identity or elsewhere?
> Has the FCC or anyone else approved TFN as ANI?
> Is TF ANI supported for STIR/SHAKEN?
>
>
> https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/toll-free-caller-id-information-helps-hhs-get-critical-phone-calls-answered-301031714.html
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> *Calvin Ellison*
> Senior Voice Operations Engineer
> calvin.elli...@voxox.com
> ___
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps@voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

[VoiceOps] Toll Free Caller ID

2020-05-12 Thread Calvin Ellison 
It looks like Somos is pushing TFN CNAM, press release below from Mar 30,
2020. I've always understood TF ANI to be invalid.

What's the news on using TFN as a caller ID?
Does this require a local charge number in P-Charge-Info or
P_Asserted_Identity or elsewhere?
Has the FCC or anyone else approved TFN as ANI?
Is TF ANI supported for STIR/SHAKEN?

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/toll-free-caller-id-information-helps-hhs-get-critical-phone-calls-answered-301031714.html



Regards,

*Calvin Ellison*
Senior Voice Operations Engineer
calvin.elli...@voxox.com
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops