Does it expose you to anything? If not shrug and shut it off. If so,
offer it with something that passes the exposure on instead, explaining
your costs change. No need to lecture them on their own laws or protect
them from themselves. They need a service provider, not a parent. :)
On
Would you be OK with 100 channels incoming used 24/7 ? Do you have a soft
cap?
If not, how much do you charge per channel ;)
Aryn H. K. Nakaoka
anaka...@trinet-hi.com
Direct: 808.356.2901
Fax : 808.356.2919
Tri-net Solutions
733 Bishop St. #1170
Honolulu, HI 96813
you can fake ANI ... of course they'd have to guess / known the number..
which would lean towards inside job.
Just make sure they sign off on usage charges and any spying liability.
Or email them every time someone goes into the conference bridge, live
monitoring, so they will be alerted if
On 06/02/2016 03:13 PM, Carlos Alvarez wrote:
There would be no exorbitant billing opportunity here, since they are
locked to 100 channels and pay a flat usage fee for them.
Well, in that case, all the risk is on you, and you're effectively being
asked to bear it.
--
Alex Balashov |
We have outbound conferencing also, they don't want that. They already do
have HD conferencing and some web control of conferences. This is purely
about their standard inbound conferencing not having a PIN. Alex's
suggestion about ANI made me think of a compromise where their internal
callers
No way.
Offer them options, as for example a whitelist of ANIs that are
automatically dumped into a conference room, or a "smart conference"
application where the conference bridge calls the participants instead
of the other way around. They might like that.
But no completely wide-open
On Thu, 02 Jun 2016, Carlos Alvarez wrote:
> We have a customer who has been nagging us to remove the PIN from their
> conference lines. They are getting more insistent. We've said no, for the
> obvious security reasons, and explained them all clearly. On top of it,
> this is a medical-related
