Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability (NeuStar DDoS

2016-03-23 Thread Tim Linn
Timothy Linn Lead Systems Engineer Voip Innovations -- Message: 4 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 21:29:15 -0400 From: Kraig Beahn <kr...@enguity.com> To: "voiceops@voiceops.org" <voiceops@voiceops.org> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability (N

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-20 Thread Robert Johnson
s-boun...@voiceops.org] *On Behalf Of *Robert > Johnson > *Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2016 3:43 PM > > *To:* voiceops@voiceops.org > *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability > > > > Their primary SBC and DR IP are both in the same IP netblock, so whenever > th

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-20 Thread Paul Timmins
ell *Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:53 PM *To:* Nate Burke *Cc:* voiceops@voiceops.org <mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org> *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability That is the issue a lot of our customers are reporting - where multiple calls are sent

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-20 Thread Nathan Anderson
Down again. me. -- Nathan From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Nate Burke Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 6:51 AM To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability Looks like it just came back up for me. Just over 30 min. Nate

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-20 Thread Nate Burke
com> Date: 3/11/2016 6:31 PM (GMT-05:00) To: 'Nate Burke' <n...@blastcomm.com>, voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability ...aand we're back. -- Nathan -Original Message- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Nat

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Ivan Kovacevic
:peeip...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, March 18, 2016 11:54 AM *To:* Ivan Kovacevic <ivan.kovace...@startelecom.ca> *Cc:* voiceops@voiceops.org *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability > Although this will probably draw a well worded and highly sarcastic > retort,

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Nate Burke
erson <nath...@fsr.com> <mailto:nath...@fsr.com> Date: 3/11/2016 6:31 PM (GMT-05:00) To: 'Nate Burke' <n...@blastcomm.com> <mailto:n...@blastcomm.com>, voiceops@voiceops.org <mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP I

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Jeff Waddell
ting alarms this past >> hour or so. >> Up and down. >> >> >> Original message >> From: Nathan Anderson <nath...@fsr.com><nath...@fsr.com> >> <nath...@fsr.com> >> Date: 3/11/2016 6:31 PM (GMT-05:00) >> To: '

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Peter E
LinkedIn From: Pete Eisengrein [mailto:peeip...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 11:54 AM To: Ivan Kovacevic <ivan.kovace...@startelecom.ca> Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability > Although this will probably draw a well worded and highly

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Ivan Kovacevic
ct Centers | LinkedIn -Original Message- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 10:53 PM To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability On 03/17/2016 10:51 PM, Peter E wrote: > If you

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Peter E
e: 3/17/2016 8:55 PM (GMT-05:00) To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability Ahem… At a risk of this not being a popular point of view… I view issues with VoIP Innovations as being largely self-inflicted. Not only on part of VoIP Innovations (no relat

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Nate Burke
ge From: Nathan Anderson <nath...@fsr.com> Date: 3/11/2016 6:31 PM (GMT-05:00) To: 'Nate Burke' <n...@blastcomm.com>, voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability ...aand we're back. -- Nathan -Original Message- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voic

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Jeff Waddell
. > > > > -- Nathan > > > > *From:* VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] *On Behalf Of *Nate > Burke > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 6:51 AM > > *To:* voiceops@voiceops.org > *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability > > > &g

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Robert Johnson
eir SBC or did not reach it in a timely manner). > > > > -- Nathan > > > > *From:* VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org > <voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org>] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Waddell > *Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:53 PM > *To:* Nate Burke > *C

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Shripal Daphtary
ssage ---- >>>> From: Nathan Anderson <nath...@fsr.com> >>>> Date: 3/11/2016 6:31 PM (GMT-05:00) >>>> To: 'Nate Burke' <n...@blastcomm.com>, voiceops@voiceops.org >>>> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability >>>>

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Tim Linn
voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>" <voiceops@voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability Message-ID: <CAO+x49LG2+RQyRU6a0zmgdgaAKd0yYyxASHm6+=9z97idxj...@mail.gmail.com<mailto:CAO+x49LG2+R

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Nate Burke
their SBC or did not reach it in a timely manner). -- Nathan *From:*VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Waddell *Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:53 PM *To:* Nate Burke *Cc:* voiceops@voiceops.org *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability That is the issue

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Peter E
Mar 16, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Problems again this morning? Looks to be acting the same as it has >>>>>>> been. >>>>>>> >>>>&

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Ivan Kovacevic
8:09 PM *To:* Paul Timmins <p...@timmins.net> *Cc:* voiceops@voiceops.org *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability I get it Paul. It's just a shame the terrorists win. Too bad we can't put a bounty on their sorry asses. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 17, 2016, at 6:55 PM

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Alex Balashov
On 03/17/2016 10:51 PM, Peter E wrote: If you use a carrier and they are attacked, chances are you're going to be impacted in some way, regardless if you are directly connected. +1. Direct connection vs. public Internet is irrelevant here. -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Nathan Anderson
o:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Nate Burke Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 3:27 PM To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability Annnd they're down again. On 3/17/2016 5:14 PM, Nate Burke wrote: 6 calls from 4 different CID numbers. All within 3 minute

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-19 Thread Shripal Daphtary
2016 6:00 PM, Alexander Lopez wrote: >>>> I added them to our monitoring platform, stated getting alarms this past >>>> hour or so. >>>> Up and down. >>>> >>>> >>>> Original message ---- >>>> From: Nat

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-18 Thread Alexander Lopez
iceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability Ahem… At a risk of this not being a popular point of view… I view issues with VoIP Innovations as being largely self-inflicted. Not only on part of VoIP Innovations (no relationship) who, as it appears, could have de

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-11 Thread Alexander Lopez
e: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability ...aand we're back. -- Nathan -Original Message- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Anderson Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 3:30 PM To: 'Nate Burke'; voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-11 Thread Peter E
Bouncing up and down over the last half hour or so… On Mar 11, 2016, at 18:31, Nathan Anderson wrote: This message has no content.___ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-11 Thread Nathan Anderson
@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability Confirmed. -- Nathan -Original Message- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Nate Burke Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 3:26 PM To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-06 Thread frnkblk
More here: http://blog.voipinnovations.com/blog Frank -Original Message- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Anderson Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 8:27 PM To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability Holy schlamoly

Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-02 Thread Nathan Anderson
is that they have had hit-and-miss service today. -- Nathan -Original Message- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Anderson Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:27 PM To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability Holy schlamoly

[VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability

2016-03-01 Thread Nathan Anderson
Holy schlamoly. Anybody else use them here and being handed outage after outage over the last 2 days? Seriously thinking at this point about doing something else. This is ridiculous. I desperately need sleep and if my cell goes off one more time... -- Nathan