[VoiceOps] Canadian SIP Trunk Providers

I work for a service provider that sells SIP trunking services. We are looking at adding a Canadian SIP peering partner. Does anyone have a list of the major players in this space that would be a good place to start our research? Thanks, Jeff ___ Voice

Re: [VoiceOps] Canadian SIP Trunk Providers

ca> wrote: > Hi Jeff > > Are you looking for a partner to originate Canadian TF and DID traffic or > LD term or both? > > Thanks > > Ivan > On Jun 13, 2014 5:50 PM, "Jeff Anderson" wrote: > >> I work for a service provider that sells SIP trunking servi

[VoiceOps] Carrier Voicemail Platforms

We are in the market for a new voicemail platform. This vm platform would be carrier grade for a ILEC/CLEC that uses a variety of TDM and SIP switches. We want something feature rich that is SIP based. Our current softswitch platform that we are growing is Broadworks. We would probably want to sta

[VoiceOps] Sansay VSXi vs Sonus SWe

We are in the market for a new SBC platform and have narrowed our choice down to two different products. The Sansay VSXi or the Sonus SWe. We will be running on a vmware hypervisor in several different markets. The SBC would be for SIP access with Broadworks and SIP peering with other carriers. I

Re: [VoiceOps] Sansay VSXi vs Sonus SWe

> shapes of organizations. > > Endpoints numbering in the thousands? tens of thousands? bigger? > > All registered access traffic or anything more exotic? > > Also who is the incumbent SBC? > > On 2/22/2018 10:32 AM, Jeff Anderson wrote: > > We are in the market

[VoiceOps] RTP Proxy TTL Behavior

We are occasionally running into a situation where our IP Header TTL expires in transit for RTP streams. It has been our observation that our SBC B2BUA that anchors media is not resetting the TTL on RTP packets but is on SIP packets. Is there a standard expected behavior for how SBC B2BUA with med

Re: [VoiceOps] RTP Proxy TTL Behavior

ose are > defaulted to absurdly low TTL, I've seen as low as 16. In general that is > where they configuration should be changed. > > ~Glen > > > On 2/11/2019 7:04, Jeff Anderson wrote: > > We are occasionally running into a situation where our IP Header TTL > expire

[VoiceOps] Preventing unauthorized access to SIP device config files

For providers that have centralized SIP device management that is available on the internet how have you been protecting your configurations from unauthorized access over https? Are there any specific measures that you found most helpful? I am assuming that certificate authentication is probably

[VoiceOps] Reputation Score Aggregator

Does anyone know of a company that allows you to search the reputation of an ANI across the various robocall mitigation companies and/or carriers? For example instead of querying TNS, Neustar, Hiya, etc individually which may not be possible without having their service, is there a company that al

[VoiceOps] What attestation for verified calls?

Has the industry as a whole more or less settled on a particular attestation level when marking a call as verified in the CNAM? If my phone receives a call and it says verified does that mean the call was at attestation 'A' only, or 'A' and 'B', any level of passing attestation, etc.? Thanks

[VoiceOps] Local Calling Jurisdiction

Does anyone know of any commercial products that can determine if a call is local? The product would look at what is defined in the Tariff documents, not just make the decision based on coordinates/distance between callers. I am aware of iConnectiv's solution. Thanks

Re: [VoiceOps] Local Calling Jurisdiction

have to pay for it. > > > > NECA 4 > > https://apps.fcc.gov/etfs/public/tariff.action?idTariff=99 > > > > Local Calling Guide > > https://localcallingguide.com/ > > > > MARY LOU CAREY > > BackUP Telecom Consulting > > Office: 615-791-9969 >

[VoiceOps] Carriers that support cic codes

If a SIP carrier wanted to support equal access, is there anything like a SIP tandem provider that can accept any Carrier Identification Code (cic=) and route to the appropriate LD carrier? The TDM equivalent might be something like Neutral Tandem. Thanks _

[VoiceOps] Inappropriately Signed Calls

What is the recommended process to investigate inappropriately stir/shaken signed calls? We have had some calls terminate into our network with our ANI but the call was not signed by us but instead a different provider signing attestation B. Thanks ___ V

Re: [VoiceOps] Inappropriately Signed Calls

r them? Are the calls for certain not > valid or are you assuming so because they are your numbers? > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:58 AM Jeff Anderson via VoiceOps < > voiceops@voiceops.org> wrote: > >> What is the recommended process to investigate inappropriately

Re: [VoiceOps] Inappropriately Signed Calls

tage of a misconfiguration, maybe they typo-ed > something similar and it happens to be your number, maybe you discovered > the next unrepentant robocalling company. > > Paul Timmins > Telecommunications Consultant > Timmins Technologies, LLC / telcodata.us > 248-379-7