A few years ago I did some interesting experiments with a plasma discharge
system send to me by Eugene Mallove.
This system was equiped with a reaction vessel connected with a long
vertical tube . The evaporated gasses could be condensed and where collected
in a second vessel.I used a K2CO3
At 11:11 PM 11/27/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
Hi,
This is my first post.
I was wondering if anyone in CF community has looked for evidence of a
correlation between the orientation of a CF cell and the amount of excess
heat produced.
Perhaps the performance of a CF cell would change if the cell or
At 11:11 PM 11/27/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
Hi,
This is my first post.
I was wondering if anyone in CF community has looked for evidence of a
correlation between the orientation of a CF cell and the amount of excess
heat produced.
Perhaps the performance of a CF cell would change if the cell or
- Original Message -
From: P.J van Noorden
It was very interesting to see that during evaporation a
significant amount
(25%) of the radioactive Thallium could be found in the
second vessel,
where you only would expect destillated water. So I
suspect that during
violent boiling of the
The researchers in cold fusion should publish there papers in peer reviewed journals.
Journals reject cold fusion papers, "cold fusion is unworkable!"
How much unpaid time do we have?
It's a catch 22. They have got us.
We should all cut our looses and run.
Frank Z
Hello
We used 201 Thallium in our nuclear medicine department
to study the perfusion of the heart.The energy emission of radioactive
thallium is about 80 eV.
Now we have a technetium based radiopharmacon which gives a better image
quality.( 140eV)
The amounts of thallium we used was about a few
- Original Message -
From: P.J van Noorden
We used 201 Thallium in our nuclear medicine department
to study the perfusion of the heart.The energy emission of
radioactive
thallium is about 80 eV
The amounts of thallium we used was about a few nanograms.
Therefore you can
inject
The DoE report really is inept and sloppy. The reviewers rejected the
data based on the first notions that popped into their heads. They made the
same kinds of silly mistakes that people have repeated year after year over
in sci.physics.fusion.
I think we should make a list of some of the
on 12/2/04 8:32 AM, Horace Heffner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:11 PM 11/27/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
Hi,
This is my first post.
I was wondering if anyone in CF community has looked for evidence of a
correlation between the orientation of a CF cell and the amount of excess
heat
Peter,
Thank you for having carefully considered this.
We analysed the reaction product with a multi channel
analyser and we where
convinced that it was 201 Tl.
However... in order that others can dispose of any
lingering questions, especially about the ability of
thallium to migrate across
At 6:51 AM 12/2/4, Jones Beene wrote:
- Original Message -
From: P.J van Noorden
It was very interesting to see that during evaporation a
significant amount
(25%) of the radioactive Thallium could be found in the
second vessel,
where you only would expect destillated water. So I
At 9:13 AM 12/2/4, Jones Beene wrote:
Peter,
Thank you for having carefully considered this.
We analysed the reaction product with a multi channel
analyser and we where
convinced that it was 201 Tl.
However... in order that others can dispose of any
lingering questions, especially about the
Latest links to, and excerpt information from, the just-issued DOE Report,
to today's New York Times article about it,
(and to info re: Dr. Mallove's cold case) have been updated.
Links are also present to references in cold fusion which are uncensored
(unlike the 'LENR' site),
and
At 11:14 AM 12/2/4, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I think we should make a list of some of the major blunders, and uploaded
into LENR-CANR.org as part of our News report. Two mistakes struck me the
moment I glanced at the report. They are:
This may be an interesting intellectual exercise, but what will
Horace Heffner wrote:
This may be an interesting intellectual exercise, but what will it achieve?
Another 15 years of bickering?
The purpose is to keep the readers at LENR-CANR informed. We would not want
the public to think that we are satisfied with the quality of the DoE report.
The document
Dec. 02, 2004
Vortex,
Earlier, Jed missed my suggestion on the DoE report.
Fortunately Steven Krivit (of New Energy Times) has foreseen the need and
has gone ahead and posted the various (anonymous) DoE requested reviews for
our study and independent evaluation to see how DoE reached its
on 12/2/04 12:40 PM, Horace Heffner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:58 AM 12/2/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
My hunch is that earth's gravity plays a essential role in the generation
excess heat in a CF cell. If I am correct, then rotating the same apparatus
will change the amount of excess heat
Akira Kawasaki wrote:
Earlier, Jed missed my suggestion on the DoE report.
I didn't exactly miss it, I thought it might be counterproductive.
Fortunately Steven Krivit (of New Energy Times) has foreseen the need and
has gone ahead and posted the various (anonymous) DoE requested reviews for
our
Perhaps it's time to demonstrate CF in everyday life in
order there be no great mystery about some secret know only to the few that
advise the king.
For centuries the people in desert areas have used water
" ollas" to cool water. These clay vessels are fixed in a woven sling and
suspended
Greeting people,
let me introduce myself, I'm new on this list. My name is Haiko Lietz, I
am a science, political, media journalist from Cologne, Germany.
I'm writing a series about cold fusion for a German online magazine
(Telepolis). I've also recently written about an (antigravity) field
Akira Kawasaki wrote:
Jed Rothwell wroge
Fortunately Steven Krivit (of New Energy Times) has foreseen the
need and has gone ahead and posted the various (anonymous) DoE
requested reviews for our study and independent evaluation to see
how DoE reached its 'final' report.
Whoa! You mean here,
Look at this, from:
http://www.newenergytimes.com/DOE/2004-DOE-ReviewerComments.pdf
Quote:
16 (a) The paper by Iwamura et al. presented at ICCF10 (Ref. 47 in DOE31)
does an exhaustive job of using a variety of modern analytical chemistry
methods to identify elements produced on the surface of
Give this five more minutes of thought, and it is even worse. Here is a
revised version:
. . . The reviewer rejects the results based on nuclear theory; it is not
to be believed, but then proposes an alternative explanation that would
violates even more fundamental chemical and physical
At 4:02 PM 12/2/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
I misunderstood the focus of your 'gravi-chem' research.
I thought your focus was D+D fusion.
Is it fair to say the primary focus of your research is the critique of the
conservation laws by physical means?
Actually, if you look at the vortex archives at
At 4:51 PM 12/2/4, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Look at this, from:
http://www.newenergytimes.com/DOE/2004-DOE-ReviewerComments.pdf
Quote:
16 (a) The paper by Iwamura et al. presented at ICCF10 (Ref. 47 in DOE31)
does an exhaustive job of using a variety of modern analytical chemistry
methods to
Welcome Haiko!
Steve
At 12:06 PM 12/2/4, Jones Beene wrote:
Horace, you seem to be saying that the condenser was
air-cooled instead of water-cooled. Of course this would
introduce major errors, and it still doesn't address the
issue of tritium.
Actually, there is no mention of a condenser in the Cirillio paper. The
In reply to RC Macaulay's message of Thu, 02 Dec 2004 15:11:47 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
nightime temp of 70 degrees F. The water temperature inside the olla will fall
to 70 degrees F as it surrenders heat to the clay wall of the olla.
Comparing the differential potential for giving up heat to
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 02 Dec 2004 13:30:54 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
When they say: Several reviewers specifically stated that more experiments
similar in nature to those that have been carried out for the past fifteen
years are unlikely to advance knowledge in this area.
In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Thu, 02 Dec 2004 08:01:06 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
deeper level I allow for such. The Critic's Circle on HSG have concluded
that Mills' orbitsphere model itself is fatally flawed, and a private
trusted source who has looked at it agrees. The trusted source indicates
At 1:24 PM 12/3/4, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
The thing that bothers me most about this is that if hydrinos are
producing nuclear reactions, then I would expect to see at least the
occasional gamma ray.
(Though there may be possible particle reactions that are far more
probable than gamma ray
---BeginMessage---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/2/2004 4:08:30 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you support me in suggesting a similar process in Sweden? I am
member in a political party and I have thought about suggesting cold
fusion. Could you give me
on 12/2/04 5:36 PM, Horace Heffner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 4:02 PM 12/2/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
I misunderstood the focus of your 'gravi-chem' research.
I thought your focus was D+D fusion.
Is it fair to say the primary focus of your research is the critique of the
conservation
33 matches
Mail list logo
