At 4:02 PM 12/2/4, Harry Veeder wrote:

>I misunderstood the focus of your 'gravi-chem' research.
>I thought your focus was D+D fusion.
>Is it fair to say the primary focus of your research is the critique of the
>conservation laws by physical means?

Actually, if you look at the vortex archives at

<http://www.escribe.com/science/vortex>

around June or July 2003, you will see that the gravi-chem stuff was merely
comments I posted here on vortex as a result of what I considered some bad
math written by folks who apparently had no concept of bouyancy.  It did
seem to take a life of its own though because it is so general in nature
and so unexplored.  The immediate energy application is probably in the
mundane field of hydrogen generation I would guess.  If there is indeed
free energy to be had from the theory (I doubt it) then it is likely to be
had in chemical form.  The only clear relation of gravi-chem to CF is the
fact that electrolysis is one mode of CF and a more efficient electrolysis
merely results in a better COP (coefficient of power) for a CF device.

However, extremely high g forces change the location of the nucleus to a
point away from the center of charge of the electron cloud.  The electron
cloud can thus be compressed, and electron shielding can potentially be
increased.  The distance between deuterons in D2, D2O, and D3O+ molecules
can be decreased under extreme pressure, thereby increasing the potential
for fusion.  As evidenced by neutron stars, *some* degree of gravitational
force or compressive force will ultimately cause nuclear reactions.  The
problem is how best to make use of such a force in a practically achievable
domain.

My main focus, if I have such, being a rank amateur and irreverant member
of the free energy lunatic finge, is collaboration in search of a solution
to the energy problem.  There is also the joy of seeing various anomalies
and puzzles posted here on occasion.  When you subscribe to vortex you
never know for sure when you wake up exactly what you might possess your
thinking by evening. 8^)

Regards,

Horace Heffner          


Reply via email to