At 02:28 pm 22-03-05 -0800, you wrote:
This article says that the Canadian Sands won't save us because you can't
squeeze it out fast enough:
http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/
They have no wine. Time to wheel out the five water pots. 8-)
Frank Grimer
Terry Blanton wrote:
This article says that the Canadian Sands won't save us because you
can't squeeze it out fast enough:
http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/
Fascinating.
Does anyone here know what the effect of peak oil is likely to be on
global warming? Lack of oil will ruin the economy
I apologize for not hearing the sarcasm, which is now
obvious to me. I live and work with fundametalists
every day and so sometimes I am inclined to take
people at their word when they say such things.
I must admit it has been a fun conversation though.
--- Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 8:34 AM 3/23/5, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
This article says that the Canadian Sands won't save us because you
can't squeeze it out fast enough:
http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/
Fascinating.
Does anyone here know what the effect of peak oil is likely to be on
At 1:32 PM 3/10/5, thomas malloy wrote:
The scenario which is being played out was prophecized 4000 years
ago, ergo it is the will of G-d. The Islamists believe that Allah has
blessed their enterprise too. The fact that Allah isn't god has no
bearing on their behavior, they believe that he is
Edmund Storms wrote:
I wonder why the article ignores
the fact that deuterium is the only energy source that is in sufficient
amount with a sufficiently high energy density?
Actually, I believe the energy density and availability of uranium would
be enough to produce all the energy we need for a
T. H. Huxley quote:
I have said that the man of science is the sworn interpreter of nature in
the high court of reason. But of what avail is his honest speech, if
ignorance is the assessor of the judge, and prejudice the foreman of the
jury? I hardly know of a great physical truth, whose
sorry guys, got this one in an email, couldnt resist. first picture
of water on mars.
http://www.kiss-ezlink.com/downloads/funny/First%20picture%20of%20water%20on%20mars.jpg
Developing the ...water into wine... theme, I had recourse to one
of Beene's old posts and was impressed by how prescient it was.
Bits like, for instance.
=
Now, consider the implications of Dry Ice Blasting.
Dry ice blasting is similar
At 09:41 am 23-03-05 -0700, you wrote:
sorry guys, got this one in an email, couldnt resist. first picture
of water on mars.
http://www.kiss-ezlink.com/downloads/funny/First%20picture%20of%20water%20on%20mars.jpg
Well, at least we were spared a picture of water on Uranus. ;-)
FG
Stephen wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
This article says that the Canadian Sands won't save us because you
can't squeeze it out fast enough:
http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/
Fascinating.
Does anyone here know what the effect of peak oil is likely to be on
global warming? Lack
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:22:51
-0800 (PST):
Hi,
[snip]
For $8k extra per vehicle:
http://wired.com/news/autotech/0%2C2554%2C66949%2C00.html
Earlier this year, GM unveiled the Opel Astra Diesel Hybrid, a
sedan concept vehicle the company claims would increase
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
The only thing preventing this
from being adopted across the
automobile industry is the will to do it.
And politics. And -- I suppose -- pressure from the oil industry. But if
the price of gasoline goes up to $5 per gallon these impediments will
vanish.
- Jed
leaking pen wrote:
on the issue of fuel economy, a friend of mine just made a good point.
there are an estimated 170 million cars on the road. if one in ten
(seems likely) have a one ounce
support the troops sticker, we are talking about a bit over a
million pounds of metal being shipped around
on the issue of fuel economy, a friend of mine just made a good point.
there are an estimated 170 million cars on the road. if one in ten
(seems likely) have a one ounce
support the troops sticker, we are talking about a bit over a
million pounds of metal being shipped around daily.
On Thu, 24
I wrote to the fellow who runs the web page under discussion
here:
http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/. I introduced him to
LENR-CANR.org, and you respond cordially. Attached is our correspondence.
I hope he does not mind my copying it here. He strikes me as being
somewhat alarmist. I do not
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Entertaining idea, but a typical
sticker doesn't weigh an ounce. More like a gram, which would cut
that million pounds down to about 30,000 pounds.
Only a gram? 10 sheets of 8 x 11.5 paper weigh 46 grams. A 3 page
letter in an envelope weighs an ounce. I have not
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:59:26 +0100
From: Haiko Lietz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear all,
This email is to let you know about my report on MHI's transmutation
experiments on German National Radio.
Incidentally it was aired on today's 16th anniversary of the announcement
of cold fusion.
German
Steven Krivit wrote:
Hey Jed,
Congratulations on your progress on the Wiki CF page. You have been
surprisingly diplomatic ;) . I also respect the time you put in as
evidenced by the discussion page.
I tried to be diplomatic. But I must say, the Wikipedia CF article there
is an unholy mess, and I
--- On Wed 03/23, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
T. H. Huxley quote:
I have said that the man of science is the sworn interpreter of
nature inthe high court of reason. But of what avail is his honest
speech, if ignorance is the assessor of the judge, and prejudice
the foreman
Perhaps it will be the best for the general public, but for scientists
nothing can beat original sources.
True.
Scott Chubb and I had a very pleasant talk with Jack Sandweiss, editor of
Physical Review Letters, and also Prof. at Yale University yesterday at the
APS conference. He seemed truly
Steven Krivit wrote:
Considering the low probability
(in the minds of honest skeptics) of cf, what will motivate scientists to
even look (through the telescope)?
Nothing will motivate them and it is a waste of time trying to motivate
them.
We have the
data.
Now, how do we get their interest?
Jed,
Pessimistic, yes. Logical and realistic, yes. Perhaps we need miracle #4,
whatever that will be.
Steve
At 11:29 AM 3/23/5, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
Research on runaway global warming, due to
methane release and high altitude water vapor, is undervalued due to a type
2 error. Failing to asses the risk early enough has a catastrophically
high negative value. The
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Entertaining idea, but a typical sticker doesn't weigh an ounce.
More like a gram, which would cut that million pounds down to about
30,000 pounds.
Only a gram? 10 sheets of 8 x 11.5 paper weigh 46 grams. A 3 page
letter in an envelope weighs an
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Steven Krivit wrote:
2. You've established a method, using references, that is acceptable
to the Wiki community. As you and others will note, your work has not
been defaced or challenged.
So far. There is no telling when a skeptic will come and erase it.
There is no
26 matches
Mail list logo
