Nick Palmer wrote:
Philip Winestone replied to me privately and, amid his assertions of
his own objectivity, he wrote
You obviously didn't read the article in yesterday's National Post,
where the writer wrote (from a scientific standpoint) that
No, I didn't. What would be the point?
R.C.Macaulay wrote:
Nick Psalmer wrote..
I have to point out that these groups you mention must be American
and are therefore unlikely to be part of the internationally
recognised and credible environmental groups such as Friends of the
Earth International (at least 50 countries) and
I think the prediction was based on the evidence that Earth has been subject
to periodic ice ages. Given the frequency of ice ages in the past it was
simply assumed there would be another ice age sometime within
the next 15,000 (?) years.
Harry
On 24/6/2007 7:54 PM, Jeff Fink wrote:
I last
You're right Harry, now it seems it could be more like 50,000 yrs before the
next ice age according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_age :
...The Earth is in an interglacial period now, known as the Holocene. It was
conventional wisdom that the typical interglacial period lasts about 12,000
Michel wrote..
You're right Harry, now it seems it could be more like 50,000 yrs before the
next ice age according to
...The Earth is in an interglacial period now, known as the Holocene. It was
conventional wisdom that the typical interglacial period lasts about 12,000
years but now appears
On Jun 25, 2007, at 3:09 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
OK Bill you have convinced me that water droplets emitted at low
fields might not Coulomb-explode (low field = low charge on each
droplet, e.g. a single elementary charge) and therefore might form
a thin linear chain along the line of
The server is up again for:
http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/airexp.html
and
http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/airthred.html
The above mentions the Electric Spacecraft Journal. Anyone know if
that outfit is still active? Looks like it has been a while since
the last publication.
I
thomas malloy wrote:
Most importantly don't over look what you can do about anthropogenic
climate change if it is happening, A: not a damn thing!
Oh give us a break, Tom! At least you can say: I don't want to pay
to fix the problem. Or: I do not feel like paying an extra dollar
per gallon
For Jeff Fink who asked about the original climate scare of human activity
precipitating an ice age:-
The predominant reasoning behind this was that human use of fossil fuels at
the time produced lots of micro particulates (dust and soot) plus acid gases.
Acid and micro particles can act
Jed,
I got a little tired of the constant bitching on the site... Many, many words.
I have more to do with my time and energy.
I didn't send you the URL of the National Post (nationalpost.com) because you
have to pay unless you're a subscriber... and I happen to be one. Suffice it
to say
laughing Richard - did you write this inside or outside the Dime Box Saloon?
(It would sound so French if you called it the Dime Box Salon, by the way.)
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 10:08:16 PM
Subject:
Nick Palmer wrote:
Ironically, although I have never seen it mentioned by anyone other
than me, the acid/particulate pollution, and therefore cooling
effect, from the much larger amount of coal burnt then may have
masked the warming effect from the increasing CO2.
As far as I know, far more
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
Jed,
I got a little tired of the constant bitching on the site... Many,
many words. I have more to do with my time and energy.
Then I suggest you stop reading my posts. Please do not complain
because I add lots of details, sources, and complete thoughts with
On Jun 25, 2007, at 1:13 PM, Michel Jullian wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 3:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Air threads
On Jun 24, 2007, at 3:50 PM, Michel Jullian wrote:
I had some trouble coming
Michael Foster wrote:
Liquids with a high Kerr constant appear to heat up much more
quickly and efficiently than say, water.
Unless you tried a number of liquids to arrive at that conclusion (Kerr
constant) it would seem not to be justified by just comparing
nitrobenzene, which is very
On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:37 PM, Michael Foster wrote:
Several months back, I had my machinist build a very small Griggs
device for use in my work. Hydrosonics only sells really large
industrial size machines, or I would have just bought one. I was
interested in heating certain monomers
Vs,
Hope this isn't considered to be to off-topic, but with our lists
connection to antigrav tech I thought this piece would offer nice
perspective to the sibling-discussion of alien life. This is,
really, a tasty morsel of a read. I really think it put into
perspective some of the
17 matches
Mail list logo
