Howdy Vorts,
Stephen Lawrence has posted some good pendulum info. A careful look at how
he has approached the subject shows he is more than conversant with the
subject.
Back in Houston and Dallas in the late 1940's and 50's we saw a rise of
technical interest in pendulums for use in
Hello Harry.
Let's make sure I'm on the same page with you on this pendulum matter.
Are you claiming the pendulum arm is going to swing back-and-forth with the
exact same periodicity frequency regardless of whether the spin-bob wheel
has the breaks on or off?
Steven wrote:
snip
In any case I
Blank Plilip wrote..
Just saw this, Richard. The market system is great, but this is obviously not
the market system... Ominous.
Begs the question: How many media and government people are fattening
themselves on all that money, for services rendered? Perhaps that explains
this failure.
Since Knapen says it is OU, and he ought to know, what
may have happened is that his remarks refer to a different
version of the toy than was seen in the video.
I think that's a stretch to speculate that Knapen is
actually referring to a different model. I reveal my
ignorance here, but who
Steven and Stephen,
- Original Message -
From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, September 3, 2007 10:47 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:resend2/pendulum and spinning bob
Hello Harry. Let's make sure I'm on the same page with you on this pendulum matter. Are you claiming the
See:
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/indepth/30976
Scroll down to the comments after the article.
- Jed
- Original Message -
From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's another admittedly convoluted and probably not very accurate explanation: A deliberate amount disinformation instigated on STEORN's part to buy the company time to get their prototype up and running. If STEORN presumably
HF AC
V1 o--- ---o V2
| |
OOO
=== T1
OOO
| | |
i-- | | | --i
-M1--- | ---M2-
| | |
Indeed, classical physics has COE built-in, and thus excludes OU if that's what
you're after.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:resend2/pendulum and spinning bob
...
I
On Sep 3, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/Electrolyser.pdf
When electrolysing hydrogen, use can be made of a diffuse or
porous (essentially transparent to
hydrogen) but structurally strong material as a supporting
structure for a Pd surfaced cathode
Horace Heffner wrote:
I still like the idea of driving the hydrogen into
the electrolysis plate itself
Sumitomo is a supplier of porous nickel tubes. This
would make an interesting cathode, especially if a
high percentage of H2 comes through the tube, rather
than remaining in bubbles on
A valid Mills' electrolysis comparison would need to
compare KOH electrolyte against a non-catalyst, for
instance NaOH.
In case anyone is interested...
A micro reactor for recombining H2 and O2
http://www.fzk.de/fzk/idcplg?IdcService=FZKnode=2741lang=en
Hydrogen Gas Standards
http://www.utahehs.org/index.php?tier=5id=125
Error in last post. I forgot to include the important capacitance,
that of the double layer. Oh well anther day another error or so...
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
If you have not seen this early electrolyzer it somehow got to YouTube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFA1aKos6LM
It was powered by 12 vdc at 100mA max current on a 50% duty cycle. What
should be noted here is the evolution of gas external of the electrodes (far
removed from the electrode
On Sep 3, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/Electrolyser.pdf
When electrolysing hydrogen, use can be made of a diffuse or
porous (essentially transparent to
hydrogen) but structurally strong material as a supporting
structure for a Pd surfaced cathode
In the series of capacitances across an electrolytic cell gap, the
double layer capacitance is insignificant because at about 0.2 F/m^2
it is 6 orders of magnitude larger than the electrolyte capacitance
at 4.423x10^-7 F/m^2 at 0.1 cm plate separation. In other words:
C = 1/( (1/.002 F)
On Sep 3, 2007, at 11:43 AM, Stiffler Scientific wrote:
If you have not seen this early electrolyzer it somehow got to
YouTube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFA1aKos6LM
It was powered by 12 vdc at 100mA max current on a 50% duty cycle.
What
should be noted here is the evolution of gas
Oh I see, I thought you meant the porous structure supported a continuous
(waterproof) Pd foil, in fact the mesh is made of Pd or is Pd plated right?
Independently of the cathode material, the idea of flowing electrolyte through
a porous electrode in order to maximize the ratio of active
Ron,
Wouldn't it be lovely if peroxide were being formed on
the (oxygen deficient) anode and then further spitting
after a delay... but more likely, since the electrodes
appear to be graphite, it is carbon related. Any idea
what the composition of the (non electrode) gas, is?
Hard to see in
This was an early video and has gone thru many conversions to get it to the
tube. Come 9/6 or 9/7 we will try to get the first CREC vids up there. The
first ones will be only to show that it is real and no hidden #00 wires or
secret stuff to drive the cell. After that a vid will show a 3amp auto
- Original Message -
From: Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 1:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Superimposed AC electrolysis current method
On Sep 3, 2007, at 3:01 PM, Michel Jullian wrote:
I agree, it's the smaller capacitance
You seem to be agreeing that incoming vs outgoing surface electron catalyzed
fusion is the thing :-) I also proposed a low hydrogen pressure gap fusor
scheme on the CMNS list recently:
-
From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
24 matches
Mail list logo
