> Here's another admittedly convoluted and probably not very accurate
> explanation: A deliberate amount disinformation instigated on STEORN's
> part to buy the company time to get their prototype up and
> running. If
> STEORN presumably -KNOWS- (or at least believes) without a shadow of
> doubt that their technology produces OU, then I can see how such a
> sense of "collective corporate conviction" could possibly be in the
> company's self-interest to disseminate a little disinformation in
> order to dampen potential competition that could possibly interfere
> with STEORN's own financial plans to dominate this particular OU
> market.
>
> In times of war, carefully planned and planted disinformation is one
> of the most effective means of implementing a successful surprise
> invasion attack.
True.
Like D-day.
Or in this case O-day. ;-)
Harry
