Re: [Vo]:Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement

2010-06-08 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 08:16 PM 6/7/2010, Mauro Lacy wrote: On 06/07/2010 07:29 PM, mailto:mix...@bigpond.commix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:31:49 -0400: Hi, I think the whole notion of quantum entanglement is nonsense. When two *correlated* particles are

Re: [Vo]:Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement

2010-06-08 Thread Mauro Lacy
At 08:16 PM 6/7/2010, Mauro Lacy wrote: On 06/07/2010 07:29 PM, mailto:mix...@bigpond.commix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:31:49 -0400: Hi, I think the whole notion of quantum entanglement is nonsense. When two *correlated* particles are

Re: [Vo]:Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement

2010-06-08 Thread Terry Blanton
Here's Wired's article on the subject: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/06/human-quantum-entanglement-detector/ T

RE: [Vo]:Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement

2010-06-08 Thread Roarty, Francis X
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Monday, June 07, 2010 6:29 PM I think the whole notion of quantum entanglement is nonsense. When two *correlated* particles are produced, they are like mirror images of one another. That means that the subsequent response of

[Vo]:Holier-than-thou nickel

2010-06-08 Thread Jones Beene
Sam M. Austin George F. Bertsch, Halo Nuclei, Scientific American, June, 1995, pp 90-95, The sub-title: Nuclei having excess neutrons or protons teeter on the edges of nuclear stability, known as drip lines. Like many holier-than-thou personalities, are the halo-endowed also drips ? Punage

RE: [Vo]:Holier-than-thou nickel

2010-06-08 Thread Roarty, Francis X
Nice ! very plausible. From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 11:19 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Holier-than-thou nickel Sam M. Austin George F. Bertsch, Halo Nuclei, Scientific American, June, 1995, pp 90-95, The sub-title: Nuclei having

[Vo]:Nickel beta decay as a driver for LENR

2010-06-08 Thread Jones Beene
The following is the second draft of a new and formative hypothesis (5 hours old) for explaining one category of LENR results involving nickel as the active host; and in particular the Arata-Zhang results and numerous replications. Arata demonstrated early-on a stronger effect in nickel than

RE: [Vo]:Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement

2010-06-08 Thread Roarty, Francis X
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Monday, June 07, 2010 6:51 PM While two particles might share a common value for specific coordinate in a higher dimension, that doesn't mean that they are in any way adjacent as in close together. In any *orthogonal* multidimensional system, the

Re: [Vo]:Another Sign the End is Nigh

2010-06-08 Thread Jed Rothwell
By the way, the fall of the pendulum may be a talisman that the end it nigh, but I believe the proof that civilization is at an end will be when they make computers without reset buttons. I mean honest-to-god hardwired interrupt reset buttons, that give you not merely a deal but a new deck of

Re: [Vo]:Nickel beta decay as a driver for LENR

2010-06-08 Thread mixent
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:20:18 -0700: Hi, [snip] If there is a cold neutron (displaced from the halo) it will decay in situ and release another catalytic electron. [snip] Neutrons don't stay cold very long. Thermal collisions occur billions of times per second, and

Re: [Vo]:Nickel beta decay as a driver for LENR

2010-06-08 Thread mixent
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:20:18 -0700: Hi, [snip] This assumes that the effective mass of the beta particle (fast electron) could occasionally either range into that of a muon, due to relativistic effects - some of which can be engendered by Casimir cavity

RE: [Vo]:Nickel beta decay as a driver for LENR

2010-06-08 Thread Jones Beene
-Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com Negative muons have a mass of about 100 MeV. That's a far cry from 67 keV. All good points. On to the next draft ... or the round file :) The key novelty, if there is anything to the hypothesis at all - is the heavy nickel isotope, which

Re: [Vo]:Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement

2010-06-08 Thread mixent
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:13:44 -0400: Hi, [snip] In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Monday, June 07, 2010 6:51 PM While two particles might share a common value for specific coordinate in a higher dimension, that doesn't mean that they are in any

Re: [Vo]:Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement

2010-06-08 Thread mixent
In reply to Mauro Lacy's message of Mon, 07 Jun 2010 21:16:27 -0300: Hi, [snip] As far as I know, quantum entanglement is different, because it's possible not only to observe but also to *change* the status of one of the particles, and the other will immediately reflect the opposite change. It's