On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
Is it truly cold and is it truly fusion? Well, it's got to be nuclear in
nature, but until we know what it *is* -- and we don't -- we can't rule
anything out, not completely.
Abd, you bring up some excellent
Wasn't this the same NASA announcement from 2010 about the Lake Mono
Bacteria whose DNA was based on Arsenic?
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/12/02/mono-lake-bact
eria-build-their-dna-using-arsenic-and-no-this-isnt-about-aliens/
From: David Jonsson
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:18 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
I did not say it was a UFO.
If you know not what it was, then it was, by definition, unidentified.
If it was in the sky, we term that flying. Whether it was an
object or no depends on what you were smoking.
:-)
T
Greetings Vortex-L
Cold fusion accepted paper for Physical Review C:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/05/iron-and-lead-fusion/
Respectfully,
Ron Kita, Chiralex
No.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 2, 2012, at 6:10 AM, David Jonsson
davidjonssonswe...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this story basically true?
http://sandbox.scp-wiki.net/transmuting-bacteria
David
David Jonsson, Sweden, phone callto:+46703000370
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:50 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I wonder if she was wise in avoiding the thing.
Unless you enjoy endoscopic examinations, I would say quite likely.
T
Greetings Vortex-L:
http://www.nzz.ch/nachrichten/hintergrund/wissenschaft/das-heisse-eisen-der-kalten-fusion_1.16688814.html
My Google Chrome Browser did a fantastic job in translating the website
above.
Respectfully,
Ron Kita, Chiralex
Probably no. There is an explanation that conserves miracles.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GFAJ-1
. enticing as the other explanation may seem to the LENR crowd and Kervran
believers .
From: David Jonsson
Is this story basically true?
The current Godes/BEC effort has changed horses - and is pursuing gas-phase
hydrogen, ala Thermacore/Rossi/Piantelli etc. They would rather we not
associate them with that old shtick… so passé :-)
There is no valid report of helium ash in protium experiments
From: Eric Walker
All
You do not need sound to appreciate the metaphorical message ...
http://www.youtube.com/embed/xWMkOwq2qIU?rel=0
attachment: winmail.dat
Dear Abd,
Thank for writing here, this opens ways to a good discussion, not focused
on minor details.
I think what we have in common and motivates both of us is the care for the
future of the LENR field.
As regarding in which extent I agree with you, it is very exactly 50%.
You say: *At this
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
There is no valid report of helium ash in protium experiments
Are there any invalid reports? Has anyone looked?
- Jed
27 April issue of Science opens this way:
A basic equation of electricity and magnetism is wrong, one scientist
claims. The classic formula for the force exerted by electric and magnetic
fields-the so-called Lorentz force-clashes with Einstein's special theory of
relativity, says Masud
Extremely childish.
Isn't this site moderated?
You do not need sound to appreciate the metaphorical message ...
http://www.youtube.com/embed/xWMkOwq2qIU?rel=0
Hat-tip to Mats Lewan : Defkalion posts job listing for 21
professionals
http://matslew.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/defkalion-posts-job-listing-for-21-professionals/
http://defkalion-energy.com/jobs
Defkalion Green Technologies is in the final stages of its industrial
prototype. We currently
I have revised this paper again to clean up problems with the Acrobat
program image compression:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmanthermalbeh.pdf
I went ahead and retyped 14 pages at the end.
I mentioned the tale of woe rejection in this paper, starting on p.
239. If you wish learn how
A recent dialog of Andrea Rossi with one of his kibitzes
(only the relevant part):
Do you plan to increase the COP in the near future?
Andrea Rossi
May 1st, 2012 at 10:54 AM
No, I do not think it will be possible to increase the COP.
A.R.
There are two possibilities;
a) if this is not true,
Perfect;y possible, however immediacy is in the question
but not in the answer. With Rossi you never know.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2012-05-02 21:11, Peter Gluck wrote:
A recent dialog of Andrea Rossi with one of his kibitzes
(only
That blog is indeed cursed by a semi-sentient program that believes
that its name is AR.
While AR can be frustrating at times, when I want answers that make
more sense and have deeper implication I use to talk the Emacs doctor
(Eliza with a degree in psychotherapy):
NanoSpire, Inc. on Harnessing Cavitation Zero Point Energy to Produce
Fusion and Transmutation in Water
http://pesn.com/2012/04/28/9602083_NanoSpire_Inc_on_Harnessing_Cavitation_Zero_Point_Energy_to_Produce_Fusion_and_Transmutation_in_Water/
by
Sterling D. Allan April 28, 2012
...
On April
More on the LeClair effect
The following doctoral thesis characterizes Protonated Water Clusters.
These clusters are formed around positive ions.
http://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/28349/1/gupea_2077_28349_1.pdf
Thermal properties of clusters and molecules
- Experiments on evaporation,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The most idiotic rejection letter I have ever seen is here:
http://lenr-canr.org/Collections/Lindley.jpg
Ceratinly (sic) is!
Dr. Lindley needs spell check!
Ass. Editor my ass.
T
In fusion both hot and cold, I have come to believe that neutrons are at
the root of all evil.
LeClair needs to remove neutron production from his process. This is done
by eliminating the collision of the cavitation micro-jet against the
sacrificial surface.
LeClair provides a sacrificial
Call me a moron, but without more context it is not obvious to me that
this qualifies as an idiotic rejection letter.
Harry
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The most idiotic
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any invalid reports? Has anyone looked?
I just looked at the relevant section of Ed Storms's book -- no
easy-to-spot reference to helium evolving in a Ni-H gas system. But there
is a large table of experiments
Dear Michele,
A very interesting approach.
The problem is to NOT confound AR's weaknesses with the
essence of his E-cat generator that has IMHO (and really, it seems)
increased with two orders of magnitude the energy
*density* and intensity compared with the nanometric Ni etc materials a la
Arata
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Michele,
A very interesting approach.
The problem is to NOT confound AR's weaknesses with the
essence of his E-cat generator that has IMHO (and really, it seems)
increased with two orders of magnitude the energy
27 matches
Mail list logo
