NANOR scaled-up from milliwatts up. Nothing to do with vodka.
Peter
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Come on! Are those acronyms, flavors of vodka, ... What are you talking
> about?
>
> [mg]
>
>
> On Thursday, January 31, 2013, Peter Gluck wrote:
>
>> Easy to answer
Peter,
Come on! Are those acronyms, flavors of vodka, ... What are you talking
about?
[mg]
On Thursday, January 31, 2013, Peter Gluck wrote:
> Easy to answer: something GREAT(ER) - much greater, useful and efficient.
> Generating intense heat, usable as a practical energy source.
> Science is m
Easy to answer: something GREAT(ER) - much greater, useful and efficient.
Generating intense heat, usable as a practical energy source.
Science is magnificent, technology works for us.
Peter
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
> I must be behind the curve ... and what might KILOR a
I must be behind the curve ... and what might KILOR and MEGAR be?
[m]
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Peter Gluck wrote:
> technologists are waiting for KILOR and MEGAR
> Peter
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Ruby wrote:
>
>>
>> There was no other video of the NANOR publicly available
technologists are waiting for KILOR and MEGAR
Peter
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Ruby wrote:
>
> There was no other video of the NANOR publicly available other than Barry
> Simon's (that I know).
>
> Mitchell Swartz's two summary of the course posted on Cold Fusion Times
> was re-posted by me
"in the last decade. The world went from connected to hyperconnected",
so Woodrow C. Monte methanol-formaldehyde paradigm, being true, is
spreading and evolving exponentially: Thomas L. Friedman: Dan Novak:
Rich Murray 2013.01.31
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2013/01/in-last-decade-world-went-from.h
There was no other video of the NANOR publicly available other than
Barry Simon's (that I know).
Mitchell Swartz's two summary of the course posted on Cold Fusion Times
was re-posted by me here:
http://coldfusionnow.org/2nd-week-summary-of-cold-fusion-101/
Hagelstein's video is of theoretic
I read that ... which is to say I scanned it but I can't draw any
conclusions from it. Anyone willing to apply their huge brain to that
document and summarize it? Thanks in advance.
[m]
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Mark Gibbs wrote
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
>>
>>> And the video is AWOL. Sigh.
>>
>> Damn. Well the .pdf is there:
>>
>> http://coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/0
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
>
>> And the video is AWOL. Sigh.
>
> Damn. Well the .pdf is there:
>
> http://coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/HagelsteinPdemonstra.pdf
Hagelstein's series of vids are still
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
> And the video is AWOL. Sigh.
Damn. Well the .pdf is there:
http://coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/HagelsteinPdemonstra.pdf
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton
> wrote:
> > Swartz has been very secretive. His web site:
> >
> > http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html
>
Yep, that's a lot of ... er, stuff.
>
> Probably the most info publicly availabl
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Swartz has been very secretive. His web site:
>
> http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html
Probably the most info publicly available:
http://coldfusionnow.org/jet-energy-nanor-device-at-mit-continuing-to-operate-months-later/
Swartz has been very secretive. His web site:
http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
> Does anyone know what the status is of the Nanor device at MIT? Has it been
> kept running? Has anyone duplicated the device and successfully run it?
>
> Th
Does anyone know what the status is of the Nanor device at MIT? Has it been
kept running? Has anyone duplicated the device and successfully run it?
Thanks in advance.
[mg]
Chris Zell wrote:
> They ran document fraud factories in which people laughingly put down fake
> names ( CBS '60 Minutes'). And nobody went to jail.
>
I saw that! It is appalling. I cannot understand why no one has been
jailed. Especially with Obama in office. Very disappointing.
People have a
Let's not forget outright fraud and theft while government regulators did
nothing to touch the scofflaw 1%.
There was a whole body of state and local legal tradition in regard to the
transfer of mortgages that was ignored by the banksters. They ran document
fraud factories in which people laug
It wasn't the free market that failed with the mortgage meltdown. It was
the federal reserve and the federal government which together created a
moral hazard. Peter Schiff had it right, back in 2006. Artificially low
interest rates promote consumption and distract from savings.
https://www.youtube
Harry Veeder wrote:
> is this it?
>
> shortened url:
> http://tinyurl.com/asqjdbx
Yeah. Still not a good image, is it? Maybe they don't want to release a hi
res version.
- Jed
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> A little more info here:
>
> http://www.sener-aerospace.com/AEROESPACIAL/ProjectsD/hector-cleaning-robot-system-for-heliostats/en
>
> There is a .pdf file out there with a bigger image but I can't find it.
>
> - Jed
>
is this it?
shortened u
I make a distinction between intelligence and stupidly. The human
mind has many features that can exist at the same time, as you note.
For example, a person can be insane yet brilliant. A person can be
stupid yet a savant. Society has no ability to make a distinction. As
a result, stupid,
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker
>> Take the mortgage melt down in 2008 and following, do you think any
intelligence was used by the financial industry. Yet these people almost
collapsed the financial system of the West, which has led to the present
financial situation. Stupid peopl
Edmund Storms wrote:
> Some of the world's smartest minds worked together to produce the
>> financial collapse. . . .
>
>
> Does what you describe not represent stupid behavior?
Yes! It is both smart and stupid, at the same time. Most wars are like that.
People who are brilliant in some ways
Is that a John Deere?
On Thursday, January 31, 2013, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> A little more info here:
>
>
> http://www.sener-aerospace.com/AEROESPACIAL/ProjectsD/hector-cleaning-robot-system-for-heliostats/en
>
> There is a .pdf file out there with a bigger image but I can't find it.
>
> - Jed
>
>
On Jan 31, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Jan 31, 2013, at 8:54, Edmund Storms wrote:
Take the mortgage melt down in 2008 and following, do you think
any intelligence was used by the financial industry. Yet these
people almost collapsed the financial system of the West, which
h
Eric Walker wrote:
> Some of the world's smartest minds worked together to produce the
> financial collapse. They had an implicit faith in the assurances of
> free-market ideology and laissez-faire . . .
> What they lacked was simple common sense and concrete incentives to avoid
> actions that
I have played the Market ( profitably). I never gamble or play poker. Even
Malkiel in his Random Walk thesis considered that there could be exceptions
(closed end funds, for example).
Cold Fusion is an effect that needs to be a practical product and large
companies might hate the idea, anyway
On Jan 31, 2013, at 8:54, Edmund Storms wrote:
>> Take the mortgage melt down in 2008 and following, do you think any
>> intelligence was used by the financial industry. Yet these people almost
>> collapsed the financial system of the West, which has led to the present
>> financial situation.
Chris Zell wrote:
>
> Dismissing Wall Street opinion on alternative energy investment leaves me
> a bit speechless - as the very manifestation of the mindset condemned in
> others at the start of this thread. Goes full circle, I guess.
>
Business investment is not an exact science. It is not re
metro.co.uk Jan 5, 2013, "Pensioners burn books to stay warm".
So, the investment in alternative energy would create more jobs? Like
polishing mirrors? Or do your robots do that after the coal miners/ railroad
workers/utility boiler feeders go on the dole?
Dismissing Wall Street opinion on a
Hmm ... was there comment from an official source on this spike? There is
not much info that I can find online.
Where are higher neutron spikes shown in the data? I do not see any spikes
which are higher, but they might not show up on the monthly chart.
http://helios.izmiran.rssi.ru/cosray/months
A little more info here:
http://www.sener-aerospace.com/AEROESPACIAL/ProjectsD/hector-cleaning-robot-system-for-heliostats/en
There is a .pdf file out there with a bigger image but I can't find it.
- Jed
Jed,
Very Cool Glossy Picture and CSP Greenie Weenie Magazine.
I will be very interested to see that thing wash 375,000 heliostats in the
Mohave Desert since there are no tracks for it to run on and they are
unevenly placed. How big is that water tank? Does another robot supply
the water?
Anyw
ChemE Stewart wrote:
> I am a Chemical Engineer, I spent 2 1/2 years of my life helping design
> the largest operating industrial solar thermal plant in the World.
>
Then surely you know that modern ones do not call for people driving around
on tractors washing the mirrors.
Here is an article
That's right, I forgot about those robots. Jed do you have the company
address I can order those through? I need a couple around my yard and one
to perform my wife's honey do list.
I am a Chemical Engineer, I spent 2 1/2 years of my life helping design the
largest operating industrial solar ther
ChemE Stewart wrote:
But it also costs approx. 1/5 capital for a gas turbine of Same MW.
>
That is true! But the cost is falling rapidly, and it would fall a lot more
with greater economy of scale.
> We will also wait to see how long 375,000 mirrors/motors last in the
> wind/dust swept deser
Chris Zell wrote:
>
> Clearly, these suffering people would benefit from more global warming
> solutions. Likewise the growing number of Spanish people now living on the
> street. Or the British people who are burning second hand books to keep
> warm.
>
I doubt they are burning books, but in an
Yes,
But it also costs approx. 1/5 capital for a gas turbine of Same MW. We
will also wait to see how long 375,000 mirrors/motors last in the wind/dust
swept desert
You forgot the fuel cost for cleaning mirrors with farm tractors and
squeegies and pumping mirror wash water from...where? I estima
What has happened in Moscow?
I don't understand the percentage. What does this mean?
It has never been so high for the last 2 years, but other spikes occurred,
even higher.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: MJ [mailto:feli...@gmail.com]
> Sent: jeudi 31 janvier 2013 16:30
> To: vortex
ChemE Stewart wrote:
So does a gas turbine :)
>
Yes, but it costs $225 per hour in natural gas. I think. ($1.50/MHW?)
- Jed
Current headline at BusinessInsider : 80% of French Think Their Country Is
Bankrupt.
Clearly, these suffering people would benefit from more global warming
solutions. Likewise the growing number of Spanish people now living on the
street. Or the British people who are burning second hand books
On Jan 31, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
What is worse, the nature of the problem is too technical and
complex for most people to understand.
In the past, all problems were too complex for anyone to understand.
In 1700 people did not even know that oxygen ex
Edmund Storms wrote:
> What is worse, the nature of the problem is too technical and complex for
> most people to understand.
>
In the past, all problems were too complex for anyone to understand. In
1700 people did not even know that oxygen exists, and yet they ran giant
cities, iron mills and
I wrote:
> It works both ways. Wind turbines cover lost production from coal and
> nuclear plants when they are down for maintenance.
>
Also, wind is sometimes more reliable and slower to vary than fossil fuel.
See:
http://www.awea.org/learnabout/utility/Wind-Integration-and-Reliability.cfm
QU
Huh?
http://helios.izmiran.rssi.ru/cosray/main.htm
Mark Jordan
You are right, Chris, mankind is being confronted by a growing list of
basic problems. Deciding which one is the most important is hard. All
of them have the potential to cause massive pain and suffering. What
is worse, the nature of the problem is too technical and complex for
most people
Chris Zell wrote:
> It is reported that thousands of wind turbines in the US are idle or
> broken . . .
>
Where is this reported? Wind turbines cost $1.3 to $2 million each. I think
it is highly unlikely the power companies leave billions of dollars of
resources idle for lack of maintenance.
Isn't the academic view just amazing? When confronted with malaise about
Bangladesh treading water in decades to come, they go all 'chapter and verse'
with specifics - yet, when asked about paying the bills, they drift off into
magic and mysticism. "Somehow" it will get paid for. Thank you,
So does a gas turbine :)
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> See:
>
>
> http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2013/01/pg-e-approved-to-buy-power-from-solarreserve-csp-project-with-molten-salt-storage
>
> The molten salt gives this 10 hours of production without
See:
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2013/01/pg-e-approved-to-buy-power-from-solarreserve-csp-project-with-molten-salt-storage
The molten salt gives this 10 hours of production without sunlight.
- Jed
Eric Walker wrote:
People will argue that consumers cannot afford the additional hit to their
> pocket books. I think this misses the point, since they're already bearing
> the price in other, less obvious ways, including monetarily.
>
Exactly. We often end up paying more than we would if the p
51 matches
Mail list logo
