I wrote:
It is not sufficient to get measurable heat in one of these devices and not
> see x-rays; it would be necessary to get high power densities. It is this
> latter observable that I have yet to see correlated with low radiation
> levels.
>
I did not say that as clearly as I meant to -- it
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Yes! They sure do assume that. So far, there has been practically no
> evidence that cold fusion produces dangerous radiation.
>
I'm less concerned about radioactive byproducts (e.g., tritium -- although
this is an excellent point I forgot abo
On Aug 17, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
If there is no neutrons, there will be no tritium. Pure protium
will poduce no tritium.
Yes, this is obviously true, Axil. The question is, How is the neutron
formed? It can not be formed outside of the nucleus as a free neutron
because this
If there is no neutrons, there will be no tritium. Pure *protium* will
poduce no tritium.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Eric Walker wrote:
>
>
>> A laptop nowadays draws 50 to 100 W. I assume future ones will draw ~25
>>> W. Imagine a small but intense 50 W heat sour
Eric Walker wrote:
> A laptop nowadays draws 50 to 100 W. I assume future ones will draw ~25 W.
>> Imagine a small but intense 50 W heat source powering a
>>
>
> thermoelectric chip, with a large radiator behind that to spread out the
>> heat. That would be doable I think.
>>
>
> While I'm symp
5 matches
Mail list logo
