[Vo]:DIAGNOSIS for the illness of Cold Fusion

2013-11-12 Thread Peter Gluck
Dear Friends, This short note was written days ago: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/11/my-diagnosis-for-illness-of-cold-fusion.html However I have decided to publish it now, influenced by a comment of Stoyan Sarg

[Vo]:OT: Switzerland’s Proposal to Pay People for Being Alive

2013-11-12 Thread H Veeder
New York Times Switzerland’s Proposal to Pay People for Being Alive By ANNIE LOWREY Published: November 12, 2013 This fall, a truck dumped eight million coins outside the Parliament building in Bern, one for every Swiss citizen. It was a publicity stunt for advocates of an audacious social

[Vo]:Wild effect at 7.8 Hz

2013-11-12 Thread Jones Beene
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUJza3l8rmU You might prefer to leave the sound off. This clip has been on YouTube for over 6 years but apparently, the underlying concept has not advanced towards a useful device in that time ... so it is most likely only a curiosity (or a fake). At 2:30 is where

Re: [Vo]:Wild effect at 7.8 Hz

2013-11-12 Thread David Roberson
This seems like a demonstration of a moderate Q mechanical resonator being driven by the drive coil. The lower loop magnet or magnetic material keeps the active loops held in the center of their local placements. Coupling between the two loops does not need to be very large provided the

Re: [Vo]:Wild effect at 7.8 Hz

2013-11-12 Thread Terry Blanton
One must wonder what effect this will have: http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2013/05aug_fieldflip/

Re: [Vo]:Momentum superkicks from monochromatic e-m fields

2013-11-12 Thread pagnucco
Axil, First, if you use paragraphs, your posts will be much more readable. Second, your URL link is broken. The new one is - Structure Enhancement Factor Relationships in Single Gold Nanoantennas.. http://sites.weinberg.northwestern.edu/vanduyne/files/2013/01/2012_Kleinman_2.pdf A good, even

[Vo]:theater at Caltech in 2014 : laughing or crying ?

2013-11-12 Thread Alain Sepeda
http://sciencebookaday.wordpress.com/2013/11/11/science-book-a-day-interview-george-d-morgan/http://sciencebookaday.wordpress.com/2013/11/11/science-book-a-day-interview-george-d-morgan/comment-page-1/#comment-50 *#5 –Do you have another upcoming project/book that you can tell us about?* I

[Vo]:ICCF18 statistics, group photo links

2013-11-12 Thread Jed Rothwell
I updated this news item to include some handy links to ICCF18 information: http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?p=1474 Let me know if you think I should add additional links. These news items need not remain static. It is a little difficult to find these links at the U. Missouri site. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Momentum superkicks from monochromatic e-m fields

2013-11-12 Thread Axil Axil
Lou, I believe that the huge energy concentrations seen in Nanoplasmonic hot spots are Dark mode concentrations of LIGHT that can produce magnetic anapole EMF. A new post will be written on this subject shortly. Matter/light interactions can pack light into solitons in an open ended manor to

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Long-term test : LONG WAIT (Aug/Sep 2014)

2013-11-12 Thread Alan Fletcher
6 Month test, after all. Frank Acland November 12th, 2013 at 5:51 PM Dear Andrea, 1. Is the current long-term validation for the purpose of getting safety certification for the hot cat? 2. Will the hot cat validation help with safety certification for domestic e-cat systems? 3. Is the

[Vo]:Brillouin Energy may be funded after SRI test

2013-11-12 Thread Jed Rothwell
See: http://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Nuclear-Power/Following-Rossis-E-Cat-Another-Cold-Fusion-Device-Attracts-Commercial-Interest.html QUOTE: . . . Big investment money is lining up. Brillouin has raised about $3 million in funding. A “second stage” $20M investment conditional

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Long-term test : LONG WAIT (Aug/Sep 2014)

2013-11-12 Thread Jed Rothwell
A 6-month test is ridiculous. It does not prove anything that a 1-month test would not prove. A week would probably suffice. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Long-term test : LONG WAIT (Aug/Sep 2014)

2013-11-12 Thread James Bowery
A 6-month test is getting into Underwriters Laboratory territory. As Rossi says: different purposes On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: A 6-month test is ridiculous. It does not prove anything that a 1-month test would not prove. A week would probably